Natural Gas Leakage Ratio Determined from Flux Measurements of Methane in Urban Beijing

A limited understanding of urban methane (CH4) emissions in China challenges the evaluation of the coal-to-gas switch toward carbon neutrality by 2060. CH4 flux was measured in urban Beijing using the eddy covariance method during a summer campaign. With a mean of 152.6 ± 107.9 nmol/m2/s, the CH4 flux was estimated to depend little on the intensity of human activities, with minimal influence from biogenic sources. Emission hotspots with large temporal variability were identified in the study fetch area, which increased the mean CH4 flux by 12.5%. Based on the lack of large, known biogenic sources in nonhotspot (background) areas, we attributed the CH4 flux in these areas (135.6 ± 70.56 nmol/m2/s) mainly to natural gas. Thus, we estimate as an upper limit that natural gas contributes 88.9% to the total CH4 flux in urban Beijing. However, poor alignment between the dominant sources in the inventories and the characteristics of the measured CH4 flux were observed, suggesting substantial underestimation of emissions from natural gas sources in the inventories. A leakage ratio of 1.4% (0.7–2.1%) of consumed natural gas was determined in Beijing. Pinpointing emissions with more granular methods could improve our understanding of the urban CH4 source profile in Beijing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00573
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural Gas Leakage Ratio Determined from Flux Measurements of Methane in Urban Beijing

Marcus Striednig, Huadan Zheng, Thomas Karl, Bin Fang Yuan et al.
10 citations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.83
article

Natural Gas Leakage Ratio Determined from Flux Measurements of Methane in Urban Beijing

Marcus Striednig, Huadan Zheng, Thomas Karl, Bin Fang Yuan, Yibo Huangfu, Ming Chang, Yang Ding, Xiaohong Chen, Ziyang Liu, Hongjuan Li, Min Shao, Xianjun He, Yuanting Zhang, Xuemei Wang
article en
10 citations

Abstract

A limited understanding of urban methane (CH4) emissions in China challenges the evaluation of the coal-to-gas switch toward carbon neutrality by 2060. CH4 flux was measured in urban Beijing using the eddy covariance method during a summer campaign. With a mean of 152.6 ± 107.9 nmol/m2/s, the CH4 flux was estimated to depend little on the intensity of human activities, with minimal influence from biogenic sources. Emission hotspots with large temporal variability were identified in the study fetch area, which increased the mean CH4 flux by 12.5%. Based on the lack of large, known biogenic sources in nonhotspot (background) areas, we attributed the CH4 flux in these areas (135.6 ± 70.56 nmol/m2/s) mainly to natural gas. Thus, we estimate as an upper limit that natural gas contributes 88.9% to the total CH4 flux in urban Beijing. However, poor alignment between the dominant sources in the inventories and the characteristics of the measured CH4 flux were observed, suggesting substantial underestimation of emissions from natural gas sources in the inventories. A leakage ratio of 1.4% (0.7–2.1%) of consumed natural gas was determined in Beijing. Pinpointing emissions with more granular methods could improve our understanding of the urban CH4 source profile in Beijing.

Environmental Science & Technology LettersVol. 11(10)
Jinan University (CN), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Beijing Zhongke Science and Technology (China) (CN), Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality (CN), Beijing Municipal Commission of Urban Planning (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Austrian Science Fund, OeAD-GmbH, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.