Pragmatic Clinical Trials, Linkages and Agreements: Interjurisdictional Collaboration on Pragmatic Clinical Trials

The randomized clinical trial framework has proven to be a robust way of evaluating and comparing medications and procedures for many years. The promise of measured and unmeasured balance and equipoise through randomization remains very appealing. Emerging challenges for trialists have been diminishing returns in terms of effect sizes as treatments become more effective and the ever-growing costs associated with the operation of clinical trials. The costs and operational overhead limit the ability of publicly funded trials to operate at a sufficiently robust level. Recently we have been working to engage clinicians and patients in pragmatic clinical trials which in part leverage routinely collected health system data to both provide an unbiased and effective means of obtaining high quality data for recruiting, randomization and outcomes. As these trials have expanded between provincial jurisdictions, we have had to look for creative solutions to assembling and sharing data in order to reach the trial goals. This presentation will examine some of the technical and logistical challenges that we have faced, how they have been addressed and the path forward for clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2505
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Clinical Trials, Linkages and Agreements: Interjurisdictional Collaboration on Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Jeffrey A. Bakal, Erik Youngson, Scott Garrison
International Journal for Population Data Science
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Pragmatic Clinical Trials, Linkages and Agreements: Interjurisdictional Collaboration on Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Jeffrey A. Bakal, Erik Youngson, Scott Garrison
article en

Abstract

The randomized clinical trial framework has proven to be a robust way of evaluating and comparing medications and procedures for many years. The promise of measured and unmeasured balance and equipoise through randomization remains very appealing. Emerging challenges for trialists have been diminishing returns in terms of effect sizes as treatments become more effective and the ever-growing costs associated with the operation of clinical trials. The costs and operational overhead limit the ability of publicly funded trials to operate at a sufficiently robust level. Recently we have been working to engage clinicians and patients in pragmatic clinical trials which in part leverage routinely collected health system data to both provide an unbiased and effective means of obtaining high quality data for recruiting, randomization and outcomes. As these trials have expanded between provincial jurisdictions, we have had to look for creative solutions to assembling and sharing data in order to reach the trial goals. This presentation will examine some of the technical and logistical challenges that we have faced, how they have been addressed and the path forward for clinical trials.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 9(5)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.