Label distribution learning for compound facial expression recognition in‐the‐wild: A comparative study

Abstract Human emotional states encompass both basic and compound facial expressions. However, current works primarily focus on basic expressions, consequently neglecting the broad spectrum of human emotions encountered in practical scenarios. Compound facial expressions involve the simultaneous manifestation of multiple emotions on an individual's face. This phenomenon reflects the complexity and richness of human states, where facial features dynamically convey a combination of feelings. This study embarks on a pioneering exploration of Compound Facial Expression Recognition (CFER), with a distinctive emphasis on leveraging the Label Distribution Learning (LDL) paradigm. This strategic application of LDL aims to address the ambiguity and complexity inherent in compound expressions, marking a significant departure from the dominant Single Label Learning (SLL) and Multi‐Label Learning (MLL) paradigms. Within this framework, we rigorously investigate the potential of LDL for a critical challenge in Facial Expression Recognition (FER): recognizing compound facial expressions in uncontrolled environments. We utilize the recently introduced RAF‐CE dataset, meticulously designed for compound expression assessment. By conducting a comprehensive comparative analysis pitting LDL against conventional SLL and MLL approaches on RAF‐CE, we aim to definitively establish LDL's superiority in handling this complex task. Furthermore, we assess the generalizability of LDL models trained on RAF‐CE by evaluating their performance on the EmotioNet and RAF‐DB Compound datasets. This demonstrates their effectiveness without domain adaptation. To solidify these findings, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of 12 cutting‐edge LDL algorithms on RAF‐CE, S‐BU3DFE, and S‐JAFFE datasets, providing valuable insights into the most effective LDL techniques for FER in‐the‐wild.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13724
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Label distribution learning for compound facial expression recognition in‐the‐wild: A comparative study

Haythem Ghazouani, Afifa Khelifa, Walid Barhoumi
5 citations
Expert Systems
Face and Expression Recognition
1.25
article

Label distribution learning for compound facial expression recognition in‐the‐wild: A comparative study

Haythem Ghazouani, Afifa Khelifa, Walid Barhoumi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Human emotional states encompass both basic and compound facial expressions. However, current works primarily focus on basic expressions, consequently neglecting the broad spectrum of human emotions encountered in practical scenarios. Compound facial expressions involve the simultaneous manifestation of multiple emotions on an individual's face. This phenomenon reflects the complexity and richness of human states, where facial features dynamically convey a combination of feelings. This study embarks on a pioneering exploration of Compound Facial Expression Recognition (CFER), with a distinctive emphasis on leveraging the Label Distribution Learning (LDL) paradigm. This strategic application of LDL aims to address the ambiguity and complexity inherent in compound expressions, marking a significant departure from the dominant Single Label Learning (SLL) and Multi‐Label Learning (MLL) paradigms. Within this framework, we rigorously investigate the potential of LDL for a critical challenge in Facial Expression Recognition (FER): recognizing compound facial expressions in uncontrolled environments. We utilize the recently introduced RAF‐CE dataset, meticulously designed for compound expression assessment. By conducting a comprehensive comparative analysis pitting LDL against conventional SLL and MLL approaches on RAF‐CE, we aim to definitively establish LDL's superiority in handling this complex task. Furthermore, we assess the generalizability of LDL models trained on RAF‐CE by evaluating their performance on the EmotioNet and RAF‐DB Compound datasets. This demonstrates their effectiveness without domain adaptation. To solidify these findings, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of 12 cutting‐edge LDL algorithms on RAF‐CE, S‐BU3DFE, and S‐JAFFE datasets, providing valuable insights into the most effective LDL techniques for FER in‐the‐wild.

Expert SystemsVol. 42(2)
Tunis University (TN), University of Carthage (TN), Institut Supérieur des Études Technologiques de Gafsa (TN), Tunis El Manar University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Face and Expression Recognition
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.