Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity

Compared to monocultures, intercropping systems offer many agronomic benefits, including higher yield stability. In this study, we assessed whether cropping systems that are beneficial for yield stability are also beneficial for pollinator communities and whether the effect is modulated by the landscape type. Using a replicated block design in one heterogeneous and one homogeneous agricultural landscape, we studied the pollinator communities in eight populations (i.e., genotypes) of white clover ( Trifolium repens ) grown as a monoculture or as a two-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne ) or three-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass and chicory, Cichorium intybus ). We recorded 1486 honey bees and 1254 wild pollinators belonging to 46 species. Bumble bees were the most abundant wild pollinators (49.6 %), followed by hover flies (23.4 %), and non- Bombus wild bees (21.5 %). Lepidoptera accounted for only 5.4 % of the wild pollinators. We found a higher species richness and abundance of wild pollinators in monocultures than in two-species mixtures, but white clover population did not influence pollinators. Moreover, species richness and abundance were also higher in the homogeneous landscape than in the heterogenous one. Most species were foraging on white clover. However, 18 species (39.1 %, n = 18/46) were recorded foraging on chicory and/or weeds, and ten of these wild pollinator species were never recorded on white clover. Our study highlights that diverse pollinator communities require both abundant floral resources and diverse plant communities, that their needs are not in conflict with the goal of achieving yield stability, and that the landscape type can modulate the effect of the cropping system. Moreover, the lack of pollinator preference for different white clover populations suggests that farmers can select mixtures that enhance yield stability without negatively affecting pollinator communities. Overall, these results highlight that intercropping systems comprising several plant species and plant genotypes can guarantee yield stability without compromising the pollinator community, showing that win-win situations for farmers and biodiversity are possible. • Ryegrass-white clover intercropping can support diverse pollinator communities. • However, several pollinator species require species other than white clover. • Landscape heterogeneity can modulate the effect of the cropping system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2024-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109295
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity

Marco Ferrante, Felix Kirsch, Catrin Westphal
5 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant and animal studies
5.15
article

Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity

Marco Ferrante, Felix Kirsch, Catrin Westphal
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Compared to monocultures, intercropping systems offer many agronomic benefits, including higher yield stability. In this study, we assessed whether cropping systems that are beneficial for yield stability are also beneficial for pollinator communities and whether the effect is modulated by the landscape type. Using a replicated block design in one heterogeneous and one homogeneous agricultural landscape, we studied the pollinator communities in eight populations (i.e., genotypes) of white clover ( Trifolium repens ) grown as a monoculture or as a two-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne ) or three-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass and chicory, Cichorium intybus ). We recorded 1486 honey bees and 1254 wild pollinators belonging to 46 species. Bumble bees were the most abundant wild pollinators (49.6 %), followed by hover flies (23.4 %), and non- Bombus wild bees (21.5 %). Lepidoptera accounted for only 5.4 % of the wild pollinators. We found a higher species richness and abundance of wild pollinators in monocultures than in two-species mixtures, but white clover population did not influence pollinators. Moreover, species richness and abundance were also higher in the homogeneous landscape than in the heterogenous one. Most species were foraging on white clover. However, 18 species (39.1 %, n = 18/46) were recorded foraging on chicory and/or weeds, and ten of these wild pollinator species were never recorded on white clover. Our study highlights that diverse pollinator communities require both abundant floral resources and diverse plant communities, that their needs are not in conflict with the goal of achieving yield stability, and that the landscape type can modulate the effect of the cropping system. Moreover, the lack of pollinator preference for different white clover populations suggests that farmers can select mixtures that enhance yield stability without negatively affecting pollinator communities. Overall, these results highlight that intercropping systems comprising several plant species and plant genotypes can guarantee yield stability without compromising the pollinator community, showing that win-win situations for farmers and biodiversity are possible. • Ryegrass-white clover intercropping can support diverse pollinator communities. • However, several pollinator species require species other than white clover. • Landscape heterogeneity can modulate the effect of the cropping system.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 378
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.