Improving the validity of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research by basing study design on a specified existing randomized controlled trial

This issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology includes 3 articles (2 reporting original analyses and 1 systematic review) in which noninterventional studies used an existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) as a reference standard to inform noninterventional study design and against which to benchmark results. This commentary provides a brief background on the challenges of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research, before elaborating on (1) the potential benefits and challenges of basing noninterventional study design on a specified existing RCT and (2) the distinction between designing analysis based upon a specified existing RCT and studies based solely upon a hypothetical target trial. Finally, several recommendations for the conduct and reporting of noninterventional studies based on existing RCTs are provided. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae317
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the validity of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research by basing study design on a specified existing randomized controlled trial

Kevin Wing, Clémence Leyrat
4 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
article

Improving the validity of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research by basing study design on a specified existing randomized controlled trial

Kevin Wing, Clémence Leyrat
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology includes 3 articles (2 reporting original analyses and 1 systematic review) in which noninterventional studies used an existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) as a reference standard to inform noninterventional study design and against which to benchmark results. This commentary provides a brief background on the challenges of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research, before elaborating on (1) the potential benefits and challenges of basing noninterventional study design on a specified existing RCT and (2) the distinction between designing analysis based upon a specified existing RCT and studies based solely upon a hypothetical target trial. Finally, several recommendations for the conduct and reporting of noninterventional studies based on existing RCTs are provided. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(4)
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.