Improving the validity of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research by basing study design on a specified existing randomized controlled trial
This issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology includes 3 articles (2 reporting original analyses and 1 systematic review) in which noninterventional studies used an existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) as a reference standard to inform noninterventional study design and against which to benchmark results. This commentary provides a brief background on the challenges of noninterventional comparative effectiveness research, before elaborating on (1) the potential benefits and challenges of basing noninterventional study design on a specified existing RCT and (2) the distinction between designing analysis based upon a specified existing RCT and studies based solely upon a hypothetical target trial. Finally, several recommendations for the conduct and reporting of noninterventional studies based on existing RCTs are provided. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.
Authors
- Kevin Wing (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-9641)
- Clémence Leyrat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-4577)
Institutions
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Published
- 2024-09-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae317
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.52
Funders
- Medical Research Council