Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types

Abstract Biochar (BC) applications in soil has positive effects on plant performance, particularly for loose soil in agricultural context. However, how biochar types affect plant performance of non-crop species and soil–plant carbon relationships is not clear. We selected five different BC types and three plant species to investigate the responses of plant performance and the soil–plant carbon relationship to BC effects. The result demonstrated that peanut shell BC led to the death of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae , due to a reduction in nutrient uptake caused by higher soil electricity conductivity (2001.7 and 976.3 µS cm −1 ). However, the carbon content of S. arboricola increased by 57% in peanut shell BC-amended soil, suggesting that S. arboricola has a higher tolerance for soil salinity. Wood BC-amended soil led to better stomatal conductance (g s ) and leaf area index (LAI) of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae due to the higher water retention in the soil (22.68% and 20.79%). This illustrated that a higher amount of water retention brought by wood BC with a great amount of pore volume might be the limited factor for plant growth. The relationship between g s and LAI suggested that g s would not increase when LAI reached beyond 3. Moreover, wood and peanut shell BC caused a negative relationship between soil organic carbon and plant carbon content, suggesting that plants consume more carbon from the soil to store it in the plant. Overall, wood BC is recommended for plant growth of R. tomentosa and C. edithiae , and peanut shell BC is suggested for S. arboricola carbon storage. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biochar
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00355-w
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types

Hao Yuan, De Li, Sanandam Bordoloi, Pui San So et al.
17 citations
Biochar
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.67
article

Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types

Hao Yuan, De Li, Sanandam Bordoloi, Pui San So, Jia Xin Liao, Xin Li, Yong Chen
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biochar (BC) applications in soil has positive effects on plant performance, particularly for loose soil in agricultural context. However, how biochar types affect plant performance of non-crop species and soil–plant carbon relationships is not clear. We selected five different BC types and three plant species to investigate the responses of plant performance and the soil–plant carbon relationship to BC effects. The result demonstrated that peanut shell BC led to the death of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae , due to a reduction in nutrient uptake caused by higher soil electricity conductivity (2001.7 and 976.3 µS cm −1 ). However, the carbon content of S. arboricola increased by 57% in peanut shell BC-amended soil, suggesting that S. arboricola has a higher tolerance for soil salinity. Wood BC-amended soil led to better stomatal conductance (g s ) and leaf area index (LAI) of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae due to the higher water retention in the soil (22.68% and 20.79%). This illustrated that a higher amount of water retention brought by wood BC with a great amount of pore volume might be the limited factor for plant growth. The relationship between g s and LAI suggested that g s would not increase when LAI reached beyond 3. Moreover, wood and peanut shell BC caused a negative relationship between soil organic carbon and plant carbon content, suggesting that plants consume more carbon from the soil to store it in the plant. Overall, wood BC is recommended for plant growth of R. tomentosa and C. edithiae , and peanut shell BC is suggested for S. arboricola carbon storage. Graphical Abstract

BiocharVol. 6(1)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), PowerChina (China) (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion (CN), Powerchina Huadong Engineering Corporation (China) (CN), South China University of Technology (CN), Aalto University (FI)
Aalto-Yliopisto, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Insinööritieteiden Korkeakoulu, Aalto-yliopisto, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Guangdong Special Support Plan
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.