Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions

Professionals are encouraged to include multiple symptom validity tests (SVTs) and multiple performance validity tests (PVTs) to assess the credibility of clinical and forensic presentations. Combining the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29, an SVT) with its Memory module (IOP-M, a PVT), referred to here as 'IOP-29-M', may be especially beneficial, as it allows for rapid assessment of both symptom and performance validity. Accordingly, the present study aimed at 'stress testing' the IOP-29-M by examining base rates of failure (BR<sub>Fail</sub>) in 109 patients with schizophrenia spectrum psychopathology, both with and without criminal convictions. In the overall sample, BR<sub>Fail</sub> were low: 13.8% and 8.3%, respectively, for the standard (≥ .50) and conservative (≥ .65) cutoffs of the IOP-29, and 12.8% and 9.2%, respectively, for the standard (≤ 29) and conservative (≤ 28) cutoffs of the IOP-M. Importantly, very few individuals, less than 5%, failed both components of the IOP-29-M.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2377594
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions

Esteban Puente-López, Sara Pasqualini, Salvatore Zizolfi, Daniele Zizolfi et al.
3 citations
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.16
article

Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions

Esteban Puente-López, Sara Pasqualini, Salvatore Zizolfi, Daniele Zizolfi, Alessandro Zennaro, Luciano Giromini, László A. Erdődi, Veronica Tatti, Donald J. Viglione
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Professionals are encouraged to include multiple symptom validity tests (SVTs) and multiple performance validity tests (PVTs) to assess the credibility of clinical and forensic presentations. Combining the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29, an SVT) with its Memory module (IOP-M, a PVT), referred to here as 'IOP-29-M', may be especially beneficial, as it allows for rapid assessment of both symptom and performance validity. Accordingly, the present study aimed at 'stress testing' the IOP-29-M by examining base rates of failure (BR<sub>Fail</sub>) in 109 patients with schizophrenia spectrum psychopathology, both with and without criminal convictions. In the overall sample, BR<sub>Fail</sub> were low: 13.8% and 8.3%, respectively, for the standard (≥ .50) and conservative (≥ .65) cutoffs of the IOP-29, and 12.8% and 9.2%, respectively, for the standard (≤ 29) and conservative (≤ 28) cutoffs of the IOP-M. Importantly, very few individuals, less than 5%, failed both components of the IOP-29-M.

Psychiatry Psychology and LawVol. 32(5)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), University of Insubria (IT), Alliant International University (US), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Procter & Gamble (Italy) (IT), IS practice (BE), University of Turin (IT), University of Windsor (CA), The Chicago School (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.