Is the continuum of coercion in psychiatry really a continuum? A statistical implication analysis

Formal coercion in psychiatry is widely studied, but less is known about informal coercion. Coercion is mostly viewed as a continuum, with formal coercion considered the most severe. The question of whether informal coercion might be perceived as even more severe remains unevaluated. We aimed to compare the perceived severity of formal coercion among psychiatric patients with four domains of severe informal coercion (finance, housing, criminal justice and child custody). A total of 456 psychiatric patients were evaluated using Rasch analysis and statistical implication analysis. All four domains of severe informal coercion were found to be more severe than formal coercion, with coercion involving child custody perceived as the most severe. The perceived seriousness of severe informal coercion may be a counter-example to the idea of a 'continuum of coercion'. The degree of severity of formal and informal coercion may not correspond to the lived experiences of the patients concerned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2377580
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the continuum of coercion in psychiatry really a continuum? A statistical implication analysis

Benedetta Silva, Charles Bonsack, Mizué Bachelard, Philippe Golay et al.
5 citations
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
3.20
article

Is the continuum of coercion in psychiatry really a continuum? A statistical implication analysis

Benedetta Silva, Charles Bonsack, Mizué Bachelard, Philippe Golay, Stéphane Morandi, Debora Martinez, Jonathan Perrin, Nolan Pedro Fernando
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Formal coercion in psychiatry is widely studied, but less is known about informal coercion. Coercion is mostly viewed as a continuum, with formal coercion considered the most severe. The question of whether informal coercion might be perceived as even more severe remains unevaluated. We aimed to compare the perceived severity of formal coercion among psychiatric patients with four domains of severe informal coercion (finance, housing, criminal justice and child custody). A total of 456 psychiatric patients were evaluated using Rasch analysis and statistical implication analysis. All four domains of severe informal coercion were found to be more severe than formal coercion, with coercion involving child custody perceived as the most severe. The perceived seriousness of severe informal coercion may be a counter-example to the idea of a 'continuum of coercion'. The degree of severity of formal and informal coercion may not correspond to the lived experiences of the patients concerned.

Psychiatry Psychology and LawVol. 33(1)
Département de la Santé et de l'Action Sociale (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.