Random and systematic uncertainty in ship‐based seawater carbonate chemistry observations

Abstract Seawater carbonate chemistry observations are increasingly necessary to study a broad array of oceanographic challenges such as ocean acidification, carbon inventory tracking, and assessment of marine carbon dioxide removal strategies. The uncertainty in a seawater carbonate chemistry observation comes from unknown random variations and systematic offsets. Here, we estimate the magnitudes of these random and systematic components of uncertainty for the discrete open‐ocean carbonate chemistry measurements in the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project 2022 update (GLODAPv2.2022). We use both an uncertainty propagation approach and a carbonate chemistry measurement “inter‐consistency” approach that quantifies the disagreement between measured carbonate chemistry variables and calculations of the same variables from other carbonate chemistry measurements. Our inter‐consistency analysis reveals that the seawater carbonate chemistry measurement community has collected and released data with a random uncertainty that averages about 1.7 times the uncertainty estimated by propagating the desired “climate‐quality” random uncertainties. However, we obtain differing random uncertainty estimates for subsets of the available data, with some subsets seemingly meeting the climate‐quality criteria. We find that seawater pH measurements on the total scale do not meet the climate‐quality criteria, though the inter‐consistency of these measurements improves (by 38%) when limited to the subset of measurements made using purified indicator dyes. We show that GLODAPv2 adjustments improve inter‐consistency for some subsets of the measurements while worsening it for others. Finally, we provide general guidance for quantifying the random uncertainty that applies for common combinations of measured and calculated values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12674
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random and systematic uncertainty in ship‐based seawater carbonate chemistry observations

Brendan Rae Carter, Ryan J. Woosley, Zhaohui Aleck Wang, Jonathan D. Sharp et al.
8 citations
Limnology and Oceanography
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
3.85
article

Random and systematic uncertainty in ship‐based seawater carbonate chemistry observations

Brendan Rae Carter, Ryan J. Woosley, Zhaohui Aleck Wang, Jonathan D. Sharp, Regina A. Easley, Maribel I. García‐Ibáñez, Simon L. Clegg, Andrea J. Fassbender, Leticia Barbero, Michael B. Fong, Katelyn M. Schockman, Xinyu Li, Marta Álvarez
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Seawater carbonate chemistry observations are increasingly necessary to study a broad array of oceanographic challenges such as ocean acidification, carbon inventory tracking, and assessment of marine carbon dioxide removal strategies. The uncertainty in a seawater carbonate chemistry observation comes from unknown random variations and systematic offsets. Here, we estimate the magnitudes of these random and systematic components of uncertainty for the discrete open‐ocean carbonate chemistry measurements in the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project 2022 update (GLODAPv2.2022). We use both an uncertainty propagation approach and a carbonate chemistry measurement “inter‐consistency” approach that quantifies the disagreement between measured carbonate chemistry variables and calculations of the same variables from other carbonate chemistry measurements. Our inter‐consistency analysis reveals that the seawater carbonate chemistry measurement community has collected and released data with a random uncertainty that averages about 1.7 times the uncertainty estimated by propagating the desired “climate‐quality” random uncertainties. However, we obtain differing random uncertainty estimates for subsets of the available data, with some subsets seemingly meeting the climate‐quality criteria. We find that seawater pH measurements on the total scale do not meet the climate‐quality criteria, though the inter‐consistency of these measurements improves (by 38%) when limited to the subset of measurements made using purified indicator dyes. We show that GLODAPv2 adjustments improve inter‐consistency for some subsets of the measurements while worsening it for others. Finally, we provide general guidance for quantifying the random uncertainty that applies for common combinations of measured and calculated values.

Limnology and OceanographyVol. 69(10)
University of East Anglia (GB), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), University of Miami (US), University of Washington (US), NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (US), NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories (US), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US), University of Delaware (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, University of Miami, University of Washington, National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Division of Ocean Sciences, Ocean Acidification Program, Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Program, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
3.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.