A method for siting adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage plants for maximum CO2 removal

Abstract Adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) is an emerging approach to mitigate climate change by removing CO 2 from the atmosphere. Recent studies show separately that thermodynamic and environmental performance strongly depend on regional ambient conditions and energy supply but neglect regional CO 2 storage potentials. To assess DACCS performance holistically, a detailed global analysis is needed that accounts for the interplay of regional ambient conditions, energy supply, and CO 2 storage potential. Hence, we present a novel method for the optimal siting of DACCS plants derived from optimising a dynamic process model that uses global hourly weather data and regionalised data on electricity supply and CO 2 storage potential. The carbon removal rate (CRR) measures the climate benefit and describes the speed at which a DACCS plant generates net negative emissions. First, we assume that CO 2 storage is possible everywhere. For four electricity supply scenarios, we show that the optimal siting of DACCS significantly increases the CRR when comparing the best and worst locations in each scenario: For a DACCS plant with a nameplate capture capacity of 4 kt CO 2 y −1 , the CRR can be increased by 63% from 2.16 to 3.53 kt CO 2 y ‑1 when using photovoltaic, and by 39% from 2.95 to 4.1 kt CO 2 y ‑1 when using wind power. Assuming a carbon-free electricity supply, the CRR varies between 3.17 and 4.17 kt CO 2 y ‑1 (32%). Second, we significantly narrow down optimal locations for DACCS considering regional CO 2 storage potential through CO 2 mineralisation. Overall, accounting for the interplay of regional DAC performance, energy supply, and CO 2 storage potential can significantly improve DACCS siting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Neutrality
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-024-00100-z
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A method for siting adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage plants for maximum CO2 removal

Mirko Engelpracht, Niklas von der Aßen, Patrik Postweiler, Daniel Rezo et al.
16 citations
Carbon Neutrality
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.40
article

A method for siting adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage plants for maximum CO2 removal

Mirko Engelpracht, Niklas von der Aßen, Patrik Postweiler, Daniel Rezo, Lara Meuleneers
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Adsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) is an emerging approach to mitigate climate change by removing CO 2 from the atmosphere. Recent studies show separately that thermodynamic and environmental performance strongly depend on regional ambient conditions and energy supply but neglect regional CO 2 storage potentials. To assess DACCS performance holistically, a detailed global analysis is needed that accounts for the interplay of regional ambient conditions, energy supply, and CO 2 storage potential. Hence, we present a novel method for the optimal siting of DACCS plants derived from optimising a dynamic process model that uses global hourly weather data and regionalised data on electricity supply and CO 2 storage potential. The carbon removal rate (CRR) measures the climate benefit and describes the speed at which a DACCS plant generates net negative emissions. First, we assume that CO 2 storage is possible everywhere. For four electricity supply scenarios, we show that the optimal siting of DACCS significantly increases the CRR when comparing the best and worst locations in each scenario: For a DACCS plant with a nameplate capture capacity of 4 kt CO 2 y −1 , the CRR can be increased by 63% from 2.16 to 3.53 kt CO 2 y ‑1 when using photovoltaic, and by 39% from 2.95 to 4.1 kt CO 2 y ‑1 when using wind power. Assuming a carbon-free electricity supply, the CRR varies between 3.17 and 4.17 kt CO 2 y ‑1 (32%). Second, we significantly narrow down optimal locations for DACCS considering regional CO 2 storage potential through CO 2 mineralisation. Overall, accounting for the interplay of regional DAC performance, energy supply, and CO 2 storage potential can significantly improve DACCS siting.

Carbon NeutralityVol. 3(1)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.