Maximal respiratory pressure after <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The <scp>SECURe</scp> study)

After COVID-19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID-19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID-19 were included March 2020-March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18-97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID-19 and little improvement was seen over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.16184
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximal respiratory pressure after COVID‐19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The SECURe study)

Flemming Madsen, Birgitte Hanel, Anna Kalhauge, Anne‐Mette Lebech et al.
1 citations
Physiological Reports
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.42
article

Maximal respiratory pressure after COVID‐19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The SECURe study)

Flemming Madsen, Birgitte Hanel, Anna Kalhauge, Anne‐Mette Lebech, Thora Wesenberg Helt, Frederikke F. Rönsholt, Jann Mortensen, Mathias Munkholm, Ronan M. G. Berg, Elisabeth Arndal, Thomas Kromann Lund, Terese L. Katzenstein, Daria Podlekareva, Jan Christensen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

After COVID-19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID-19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID-19 were included March 2020-March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18-97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID-19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID-19 and little improvement was seen over time.

Physiological ReportsVol. 12(17)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Center for Clinical Research and Prevention (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.