Misses or False Alarms? How Error Type Affects Confidence In Automation Reliability Estimates

Prior research has shown that automation errors—false alarms and misses—differentially impact operator behavior, yet it is not clear why this difference exists. This study examined how the type of automation error, the automation’s reliability, and the number of experiences a person has with an automated system impacts their perception of the system. Participants responded to the correctness of an automation recommendation about the match between pairs of Mega Block shapes while automation reliability, number of trials, and error type varied. At the end of each block, participants provided their estimates of the automation’s reliability, ratings of their confidence in their reliability estimate, and their trust in the system. Our findings indicated that the type of automation error does not impact operator perceptions of the system. Instead, factors such as working memory limitations and pre-existing biases impact these perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275093
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misses or False Alarms? How Error Type Affects Confidence In Automation Reliability Estimates

Colleen E. Patton, Ebernoe Guzman-Bonilla
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
0.64
article

Misses or False Alarms? How Error Type Affects Confidence In Automation Reliability Estimates

Colleen E. Patton, Ebernoe Guzman-Bonilla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Prior research has shown that automation errors—false alarms and misses—differentially impact operator behavior, yet it is not clear why this difference exists. This study examined how the type of automation error, the automation’s reliability, and the number of experiences a person has with an automated system impacts their perception of the system. Participants responded to the correctness of an automation recommendation about the match between pairs of Mega Block shapes while automation reliability, number of trials, and error type varied. At the end of each block, participants provided their estimates of the automation’s reliability, ratings of their confidence in their reliability estimate, and their trust in the system. Our findings indicated that the type of automation error does not impact operator perceptions of the system. Instead, factors such as working memory limitations and pre-existing biases impact these perceptions.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
North Carolina State University (US), North Central State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.