Uncertainty Differences in Computing Hierarchical Pedestrian Behaviors

The development of autonomous vehicles presents significant challenges, particularly in predicting pedestrian behaviors. This study addresses the critical issue of uncertainty in such predictions by distinguishing between aleatoric (intrinsic randomness) and epistemic (knowledge limitations) uncertainties. Using evidential deep learning (EDL) techniques, we analyze these uncertainties in two key pedestrian behaviors: road crossing and short-term movement prediction. Our findings indicate that epistemic uncertainty is consistently higher than aleatoric uncertainty, highlighting the greater difficulty in predicting pedestrian actions due to limited information. Additionally, both types of uncertainties are more pronounced in crossing predictions compared to destination predictions, underscoring the complexity of future-oriented behaviors. These insights emphasize the necessity for AV algorithms to account for different levels of behavior-related uncertainties, ultimately enhancing the safety and efficiency of autonomous driving systems. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of pedestrian behavior prediction and lays the groundwork for future studies to explore scenario-specific uncertainty factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275937
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Differences in Computing Hierarchical Pedestrian Behaviors

Zhengming Zhang, Renran Tian
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
article

Uncertainty Differences in Computing Hierarchical Pedestrian Behaviors

Zhengming Zhang, Renran Tian
article en

Abstract

The development of autonomous vehicles presents significant challenges, particularly in predicting pedestrian behaviors. This study addresses the critical issue of uncertainty in such predictions by distinguishing between aleatoric (intrinsic randomness) and epistemic (knowledge limitations) uncertainties. Using evidential deep learning (EDL) techniques, we analyze these uncertainties in two key pedestrian behaviors: road crossing and short-term movement prediction. Our findings indicate that epistemic uncertainty is consistently higher than aleatoric uncertainty, highlighting the greater difficulty in predicting pedestrian actions due to limited information. Additionally, both types of uncertainties are more pronounced in crossing predictions compared to destination predictions, underscoring the complexity of future-oriented behaviors. These insights emphasize the necessity for AV algorithms to account for different levels of behavior-related uncertainties, ultimately enhancing the safety and efficiency of autonomous driving systems. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of pedestrian behavior prediction and lays the groundwork for future studies to explore scenario-specific uncertainty factors.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
North Carolina State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.