Augmented Reality in Extra-Vehicular Activities: Optimizing Alert Detection and Cognitive Workload

This study investigates the impact of augmented reality (AR) system complexity (active vs. passive) and lighting conditions (normal, dark, glare) on task performance, cognitive workload, and alert detection during simulated extravehicular activities (EVAs). Fifty-eight undergraduate students participated, using AR systems to complete tasks. Key metrics included task completion rate, completion time, alert detection, and cognitive workload assessed by the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Results showed no significant differences in task performance or cognitive workload across lighting conditions and AR types. Notably, less than 15% of participants noticed any alerts, suggesting AR alerts may lack sufficient salience. The study’s lack of significant findings is attributed to the small sample size and potential insensitivity of measures. Future research should involve larger samples and refined methodologies to better understand AR’s impact on astronaut performance and safety during EVAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241276460
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmented Reality in Extra-Vehicular Activities: Optimizing Alert Detection and Cognitive Workload

Xue Zheng, Melissa Cloutier, Shrreya P. Aagarwal, Justin Lee et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Augmented Reality in Extra-Vehicular Activities: Optimizing Alert Detection and Cognitive Workload

Xue Zheng, Melissa Cloutier, Shrreya P. Aagarwal, Justin Lee, Yining Zhang, Jasmine M. Manansala, Mert Culcu, Daniel H. Kuo, Benjamin Rubin, Chloe S. Park
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of augmented reality (AR) system complexity (active vs. passive) and lighting conditions (normal, dark, glare) on task performance, cognitive workload, and alert detection during simulated extravehicular activities (EVAs). Fifty-eight undergraduate students participated, using AR systems to complete tasks. Key metrics included task completion rate, completion time, alert detection, and cognitive workload assessed by the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Results showed no significant differences in task performance or cognitive workload across lighting conditions and AR types. Notably, less than 15% of participants noticed any alerts, suggesting AR alerts may lack sufficient salience. The study’s lack of significant findings is attributed to the small sample size and potential insensitivity of measures. Future research should involve larger samples and refined methodologies to better understand AR’s impact on astronaut performance and safety during EVAs.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.