Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients

BACKGROUND Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used to reduce pulmonary atelectasis in patients under general anesthesia, but they can lead to a decrease in cerebral hemodynamics. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized to a manual sustained inflation (SI) group or a stepwise increase in PEEP (IP) group. During both RMs, the peak airway pressure (Ppeak) was maintained at 30 cmH₂O for 30 s. Electrical impedance tomography was used to evaluate pulmonary aeration changes. Mean velocity of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery (Vm) and cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO₂) was monitored intraoperatively. RESULTS IP improved lung aeration better at Ppeak=30 cmH₂O than SI (58.2±8.4% vs 46.0±8.3%, P=0.001) and this persisted until the end of surgery. Dorsal (dependent) ventilation 30 min after extubation in the SI group was lower than that before surgery (7.7±2.6% vs 9.9±3.8%, P=0.003). Vm and rScO₂ returned to baseline immediately after RM in the SI group, while it remained below baseline in the IP group (42.5±12.6 vs 50.9±18.8 cm/s, P<0.001 and 68.1±3.5% vs 70.6±3.7%, P=0.001). Heart rate declined significantly during RM only in the SI group (55.9±6.6 vs 52.2±6.9 bpm, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Compared with SI, IP performed better in improving lung aeration, with greater hemodynamic stability. IP resulted in slower recovery of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation.