Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data

Digital trace data is an increasingly popular alternative to surveys, often considered as the gold standard. This study critically assesses the use of web tracking data to study online media exposure. Specifically, we focus on a critical error source of this type of data, tracking undercoverage: researchers’ failure to capture data from all the devices and browsers that individuals utilize to go online. Using data from Spain, Portugal, and Italy, we explore undercoverage in online panels and simulate biases in online media exposure estimates. We show that undercoverage is highly prevalent when using commercial panels, with more than 70% of participants affected. Additionally, the primary determinant of undercoverage is the type and number of devices used, rather than individual’s characteristics. Moreover, through a simulation study, we demonstrate that web tracking estimates are often substantially biased. Methodologically, the paper showcases how auxiliary survey data can help study web tracking errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Methods and Measures
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2024.2393165
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data

Oriol J. Bosch, Jouni Kuha, Patrick Sturgis, Mélanie Revilla
8 citations
Communication Methods and Measures
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
9.06
article

Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data

Oriol J. Bosch, Jouni Kuha, Patrick Sturgis, Mélanie Revilla
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Digital trace data is an increasingly popular alternative to surveys, often considered as the gold standard. This study critically assesses the use of web tracking data to study online media exposure. Specifically, we focus on a critical error source of this type of data, tracking undercoverage: researchers’ failure to capture data from all the devices and browsers that individuals utilize to go online. Using data from Spain, Portugal, and Italy, we explore undercoverage in online panels and simulate biases in online media exposure estimates. We show that undercoverage is highly prevalent when using commercial panels, with more than 70% of participants affected. Additionally, the primary determinant of undercoverage is the type and number of devices used, rather than individual’s characteristics. Moreover, through a simulation study, we demonstrate that web tracking estimates are often substantially biased. Methodologically, the paper showcases how auxiliary survey data can help study web tracking errors.

Communication Methods and MeasuresVol. 19(2)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals (ES), Leverhulme Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
9.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.