Comment on ‘Reversible superconducting-normal phase transition in a magnetic field: the energy-momentum balance including the velocity field of the Berry connection from many-body wave functions’ (2024, <i>Physica Scripta</i>, <b>99</b>, 015952)

Abstract According to the article by Hiroyasu Koizumi (2024 Physica Scripta 99 015952) not only Joule heat, but also latent heat should be absent during the superconducting-normal transition in the presence of the magnetic field H = H c ( T ). The publication of the false theory became possible because the author of this theory does not know that the transition at H = H c ( T ) is considered as the first-order phase transition after 1933. The theory, alternative to the conventional BCS theory of superconductivity, was provoked by Hirsch’s publications and the author’s false understanding of the results of calorimetric experiments. The alternative theory contradicts to the law of energy conservation since its author does not know about the work performed during the transition at H = H c ( T ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Scripta
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad7298
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comment on ‘Reversible superconducting-normal phase transition in a magnetic field: the energy-momentum balance including the velocity field of the Berry connection from many-body wave functions’ (2024, Physica Scripta, 99, 015952)

А. В. Никулов
Physica Scripta
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
article

Comment on ‘Reversible superconducting-normal phase transition in a magnetic field: the energy-momentum balance including the velocity field of the Berry connection from many-body wave functions’ (2024, Physica Scripta, 99, 015952)

А. В. Никулов
article en

Abstract

Abstract According to the article by Hiroyasu Koizumi (2024 Physica Scripta 99 015952) not only Joule heat, but also latent heat should be absent during the superconducting-normal transition in the presence of the magnetic field H = H c ( T ). The publication of the false theory became possible because the author of this theory does not know that the transition at H = H c ( T ) is considered as the first-order phase transition after 1933. The theory, alternative to the conventional BCS theory of superconductivity, was provoked by Hirsch’s publications and the author’s false understanding of the results of calorimetric experiments. The alternative theory contradicts to the law of energy conservation since its author does not know about the work performed during the transition at H = H c ( T ).

Physica ScriptaVol. 99(10)
Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.