Long-term outcome and predictors of neurological recovery in cervical spinal cord injury: a population-based cohort study

This retrospective study analyzed prognostic factors for neurological improvement and ambulation in 194 adult patients (≥ 15 years) with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries treated at the neurological SCI unit (SCIU) at the Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden, between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome was American spinal injury association impairment scale (AIS) improvement, with secondary focus on ambulation restoration. Results showed 41% experienced AIS improvement, with 51% regaining ambulation over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Significant AIS improvement (p < 0.001) and reduced bladder/bowel dysfunction (p < 0.001) were noted. Multivariable analysis identified initial AIS C-D (< 0.001), central cord syndrome (p = 0.016), and C0-C3 injury (p = 0.017) as positive AIS improvement predictors, while lower extremity motor score (LEMS) (p < 0.001) and longer ICU stays (p < 0.001) were negative predictors. Patients with initial AIS C-D (p < 0.001) and higher LEMS (p < 0.001) were more likely to regain ambulation. Finally, older age was a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.003). In conclusion, initial injury severity significantly predicted neurological improvement and ambulation. Recovery was observed even in severe cases, emphasizing the importance of tailored rehabilitation for improved outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71983-2
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term outcome and predictors of neurological recovery in cervical spinal cord injury: a population-based cohort study

Erik Edström, Vasilios Stenimahitis, Claes Hultling, Alexander Fletcher‐Sandersjöö et al.
12 citations
Scientific Reports
Spinal Cord Injury Research
5.10
article

Long-term outcome and predictors of neurological recovery in cervical spinal cord injury: a population-based cohort study

Erik Edström, Vasilios Stenimahitis, Claes Hultling, Alexander Fletcher‐Sandersjöö, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Paul Gerdhem, Aman Singh, Maria Gharios, Magnus Andersson, Adrian Elmi‐Terander, Ali Buwaider
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This retrospective study analyzed prognostic factors for neurological improvement and ambulation in 194 adult patients (≥ 15 years) with traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries treated at the neurological SCI unit (SCIU) at the Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden, between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome was American spinal injury association impairment scale (AIS) improvement, with secondary focus on ambulation restoration. Results showed 41% experienced AIS improvement, with 51% regaining ambulation over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Significant AIS improvement (p < 0.001) and reduced bladder/bowel dysfunction (p < 0.001) were noted. Multivariable analysis identified initial AIS C-D (< 0.001), central cord syndrome (p = 0.016), and C0-C3 injury (p = 0.017) as positive AIS improvement predictors, while lower extremity motor score (LEMS) (p < 0.001) and longer ICU stays (p < 0.001) were negative predictors. Patients with initial AIS C-D (p < 0.001) and higher LEMS (p < 0.001) were more likely to regain ambulation. Finally, older age was a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.003). In conclusion, initial injury severity significantly predicted neurological improvement and ambulation. Recovery was observed even in severe cases, emphasizing the importance of tailored rehabilitation for improved outcomes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Örebro University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Environment Institute (SE)
Karolinska Institutet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.