Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?

Abstract Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12208
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?

Salim Chahine, Mohamad Mazboudi, Mingying Cheng, Yiwei Fang
2 citations
Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
1.89
article

Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes?

Salim Chahine, Mohamad Mazboudi, Mingying Cheng, Yiwei Fang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using insights from the social network theory which posits that individuals with high network centrality have influence and power within their social networks, we argue that CEO network centrality increases the CEO bargaining power in audit fee negotiations. We find that audit fees are lower in firms managed by CEOs with high network centrality. We also find that high‐centrality CEOs do not negotiate audit fees at the expense of lower‐quality audit services. We further document the influence high‐centrality CEOs have on the audit decisions of their social peers within the network. For example, we show that less central (i.e., peripheral) CEOs are likely to hire auditors that do work for firms with CEOs enjoying high levels of network centrality. Together our findings suggest that high network centrality reflects a bargaining power CEOs can use to lower their audit fees.

Financial Markets Institutions and InstrumentsVol. 34(1)
Soochow University (CN), Rowan University (US), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
1.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do high‐centrality CEOs influence audit outcomes? — Salim Chahine, Mohamad Mazboudi, et al. · Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS