Central Corneal Thickness: Comparison between diabetics and nondiabetics

Background and objectives: The cornea play a significant role in eye refraction. With early detection and prompt treatment, ocular problems linked to diabetes mellitus can be prevented from progressing. The purpose of this study was to compare the central corneal thicknesses of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Methods: In Duhok Teaching Eye Hospital; a comparative cross-sectional study had been conducted between 01.01.2022 and 30.06.2022. There were 100 participants, 50 in diabetes group, and 50 in a control group. The diabetic group is further subdivided into three categories based on the duration of diabetes (less than 5 years, more than 5 to10 years, and above 10 years), as well as two subgroups based on the type of diabetes mellitus (type I and type II). The thickness of the central cornea was measured using SIRIUS corneal pachymetry and topography. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the non-diabetic and diabetic groups in terms of central corneal thickness (549.6 micrometers 541.4 micrometers, P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference (P 0.05) between the mean central corneal thickness of diabetics with diabetes mellitus for more than ten years and non-diabetics and diabetics with diabetes for five years. Conclusion: In comparison to both non-diabetics and diabetics with diabetes for five years or less, those with long-term diabetes mellitus (diabetes for more than ten years) had a bigger statistically significant average central corneal thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced medical journal
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2024.275
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Central Corneal Thickness: Comparison between diabetics and nondiabetics

Neshiteman Hashim Abdulrahman, Mohammed Muneer Labeeb, Khosro Senyar Tato
Advanced medical journal
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Central Corneal Thickness: Comparison between diabetics and nondiabetics

Neshiteman Hashim Abdulrahman, Mohammed Muneer Labeeb, Khosro Senyar Tato
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: The cornea play a significant role in eye refraction. With early detection and prompt treatment, ocular problems linked to diabetes mellitus can be prevented from progressing. The purpose of this study was to compare the central corneal thicknesses of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Methods: In Duhok Teaching Eye Hospital; a comparative cross-sectional study had been conducted between 01.01.2022 and 30.06.2022. There were 100 participants, 50 in diabetes group, and 50 in a control group. The diabetic group is further subdivided into three categories based on the duration of diabetes (less than 5 years, more than 5 to10 years, and above 10 years), as well as two subgroups based on the type of diabetes mellitus (type I and type II). The thickness of the central cornea was measured using SIRIUS corneal pachymetry and topography. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the non-diabetic and diabetic groups in terms of central corneal thickness (549.6 micrometers 541.4 micrometers, P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference (P 0.05) between the mean central corneal thickness of diabetics with diabetes mellitus for more than ten years and non-diabetics and diabetics with diabetes for five years. Conclusion: In comparison to both non-diabetics and diabetics with diabetes for five years or less, those with long-term diabetes mellitus (diabetes for more than ten years) had a bigger statistically significant average central corneal thickness.

Advanced medical journalVol. 9(3)
Council of Higher Education (TR), ViteroRetinal Surgery (US), University of Duhok (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.