Cross-lingual dependency parsing for a language with a unique script

Abstract Syntactic parsing is one of the areas in Natural Language Processing. The development of large-scale multilingual language models has enabled cross-lingual parsing approaches, which allows us to develop parsers for languages that do not have treebanks available. However, these approaches rely on the assumption that languages share orthographic representations and lexical entries. In this article, we investigate methods for developing a dependency parser for Xibe, a low-resource language that is written in a unique script. We first investigate lexicalized monolingual dependency parsing experiments to examine the effectiveness of word, part-of-speech, and character embeddings as well as pre-trained language models. Results show that character embeddings can significantly improve performance, while pre-trained language models decrease performance since they do not recognize the Xibe script. We also train delexicalized monolingual models, which yield competitive results to the best lexicalized model. Since the monolingual models are trained on a very small training set, we also investigate lexicalized and delexicalized cross-lingual models. We use six closely related languages as source language, which cover a wide range of scripts. In this setting, the delexicalized models achieve higher performance than lexicalized models. A final experiment shows that we can increase performance of the cross-lingual model by combining source languages and selecting the most similar sentences to Xibe as training set. However, all cross-lingual parsing results are still considerably lower than the monolingual model. We attribute the low performance of cross-lingual methods to syntactic and annotation differences as well as to the impoverished input of Universal Dependency Part-of-Speech tags that the delexicalized model has access to.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural language processing.
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/nlp.2024.21
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-lingual dependency parsing for a language with a unique script

Sandra Kübler, Daniel Dakota, He Zhou
1 citations
Natural language processing.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
article

Cross-lingual dependency parsing for a language with a unique script

Sandra Kübler, Daniel Dakota, He Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Syntactic parsing is one of the areas in Natural Language Processing. The development of large-scale multilingual language models has enabled cross-lingual parsing approaches, which allows us to develop parsers for languages that do not have treebanks available. However, these approaches rely on the assumption that languages share orthographic representations and lexical entries. In this article, we investigate methods for developing a dependency parser for Xibe, a low-resource language that is written in a unique script. We first investigate lexicalized monolingual dependency parsing experiments to examine the effectiveness of word, part-of-speech, and character embeddings as well as pre-trained language models. Results show that character embeddings can significantly improve performance, while pre-trained language models decrease performance since they do not recognize the Xibe script. We also train delexicalized monolingual models, which yield competitive results to the best lexicalized model. Since the monolingual models are trained on a very small training set, we also investigate lexicalized and delexicalized cross-lingual models. We use six closely related languages as source language, which cover a wide range of scripts. In this setting, the delexicalized models achieve higher performance than lexicalized models. A final experiment shows that we can increase performance of the cross-lingual model by combining source languages and selecting the most similar sentences to Xibe as training set. However, all cross-lingual parsing results are still considerably lower than the monolingual model. We attribute the low performance of cross-lingual methods to syntactic and annotation differences as well as to the impoverished input of Universal Dependency Part-of-Speech tags that the delexicalized model has access to.

Natural language processing.Vol. 31(2)
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-lingual dependency parsing for a language with a unique script — Sandra Kübler, Daniel Dakota, et al. · Natural language processing. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS