Korea’s technological level evaluation compared with global direct air capture (DAC) and reactive capture and conversion (RCC) technologies: Expert surveys using the Delphi method

As the need for carbon neutrality strategies intensifies globally, direct air capture (DAC) and reactive capture and conversion (RCC) technologies are emerging as important solutions to mitigating climate change through atmospheric carbon dioxide removal. DAC technologies are categorized into three types: i) liquid DAC, ii) solid DAC, and iii) membrane DAC, and each has specific operational and energy requirements. RCC technologies, which simultaneously capture and convert CO₂ into valuable products, also hold significant promise for a circular carbon economy. This study evaluates South Korea&quots standing with regard to global DAC and RCC technological levels using a Delphi method-based survey of experts. The analysis aims to establish the relative position of Korea&quots technological capabilities compared to leading countries in this field. By leveraging expert opinions through the Delphi method, this research assesses Korea&quots position and derives strategic recommendations for future technological development and international cooperation, which are vital to achieving Korea&quots 2050 carbon neutrality goals and enhancing global competitiveness in climate technology. This study concludes that Korea&quots DAC and RCC technologies stand at 71-85% of the technological level of the leading countries globally and that significant technological improvements are still required. As policy recommendations, this research emphasizes the need for i) intensified research and development efforts, ii) more robust international cooperation, and iii) incentive-based policies to facilitate the demonstration and deployment of scalable DAC and RCC technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Change Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2024.15.4.489
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Korea’s technological level evaluation compared with global direct air capture (DAC) and reactive capture and conversion (RCC) technologies: Expert surveys using the Delphi method

Chaewoon Oh, Yewon Song, Sangjin Oh
4 citations
Journal of Climate Change Research
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
0.85
article

Korea’s technological level evaluation compared with global direct air capture (DAC) and reactive capture and conversion (RCC) technologies: Expert surveys using the Delphi method

Chaewoon Oh, Yewon Song, Sangjin Oh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

As the need for carbon neutrality strategies intensifies globally, direct air capture (DAC) and reactive capture and conversion (RCC) technologies are emerging as important solutions to mitigating climate change through atmospheric carbon dioxide removal. DAC technologies are categorized into three types: i) liquid DAC, ii) solid DAC, and iii) membrane DAC, and each has specific operational and energy requirements. RCC technologies, which simultaneously capture and convert CO₂ into valuable products, also hold significant promise for a circular carbon economy. This study evaluates South Korea&quots standing with regard to global DAC and RCC technological levels using a Delphi method-based survey of experts. The analysis aims to establish the relative position of Korea&quots technological capabilities compared to leading countries in this field. By leveraging expert opinions through the Delphi method, this research assesses Korea&quots position and derives strategic recommendations for future technological development and international cooperation, which are vital to achieving Korea&quots 2050 carbon neutrality goals and enhancing global competitiveness in climate technology. This study concludes that Korea&quots DAC and RCC technologies stand at 71-85% of the technological level of the leading countries globally and that significant technological improvements are still required. As policy recommendations, this research emphasizes the need for i) intensified research and development efforts, ii) more robust international cooperation, and iii) incentive-based policies to facilitate the demonstration and deployment of scalable DAC and RCC technologies.

Journal of Climate Change ResearchVol. 15(4)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.