SP1.5 - PRESS survey: PREvention of surgical site infection—a global pan-specialty survey of practice

Abstract Aims This survey aimed to establish current global practice across surgical subspecialties in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI). Methodology A cross-sectional survey was formulated following a published protocol, aligning with established global guidelines for SSI prevention. A panel of experts provided guidance during iterative rounds of internal validation, incorporating consensus-based modifications. Prior to online dissemination via QualtricsXM link and QR code through international surgical societies, the survey underwent final external validation. Recruitment strategies were through international societies, snowballing and social media. Findings There were 1232 responses from 97 countries, with 698(56.7%) participants completing all inquiries. Responses were primarily provided by consultants or equivalent (766,75.2%), spanning all ten Royal College of Surgeons-recognised subspecialties. A significant majority (786/889,88.4%) routinely employs clinical examination for SSI diagnosis, while one-third (305/889,34.3%) never use the CDC criteria. Regarding surgical field preparation, less than half regularly use alcoholic povidone-iodine (339/778,43.6%) or chlorhexidine gluconate (370/778,47.6%). However, approximately one-third often or always use aqueous (478/1556,30.7%) or alcoholic (454/1556,29.2%) solutions for hand scrub. Surgeons exhibit a higher likelihood of changing gloves (614/734,83.7%) than instruments (513/734,69.9%) to facilitate clean skin closure. Most UK surgeons (181/206,87.9%) express equipoise in randomising patients for interventions in a potential platform trial evaluating SSI prevention. Conclusions Significant diversity characterizes global and subspecialty-specific practices in various SSI prevention measures, attributable to conflicting guidance and limited evidentiary support for recommendations. Encouragingly, a substantial number of surgeons express readiness to contribute to a robust evidence base through participation in potential platform trials for SSI prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.013
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP1.5 - PRESS survey: PREvention of surgical site infection—a global pan-specialty survey of practice

Josephine Walshaw, Marina Yiasemidou, Ian Chetter, Ross Lathan
British journal of surgery
Surgical site infection prevention
article

SP1.5 - PRESS survey: PREvention of surgical site infection—a global pan-specialty survey of practice

Josephine Walshaw, Marina Yiasemidou, Ian Chetter, Ross Lathan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims This survey aimed to establish current global practice across surgical subspecialties in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI). Methodology A cross-sectional survey was formulated following a published protocol, aligning with established global guidelines for SSI prevention. A panel of experts provided guidance during iterative rounds of internal validation, incorporating consensus-based modifications. Prior to online dissemination via QualtricsXM link and QR code through international surgical societies, the survey underwent final external validation. Recruitment strategies were through international societies, snowballing and social media. Findings There were 1232 responses from 97 countries, with 698(56.7%) participants completing all inquiries. Responses were primarily provided by consultants or equivalent (766,75.2%), spanning all ten Royal College of Surgeons-recognised subspecialties. A significant majority (786/889,88.4%) routinely employs clinical examination for SSI diagnosis, while one-third (305/889,34.3%) never use the CDC criteria. Regarding surgical field preparation, less than half regularly use alcoholic povidone-iodine (339/778,43.6%) or chlorhexidine gluconate (370/778,47.6%). However, approximately one-third often or always use aqueous (478/1556,30.7%) or alcoholic (454/1556,29.2%) solutions for hand scrub. Surgeons exhibit a higher likelihood of changing gloves (614/734,83.7%) than instruments (513/734,69.9%) to facilitate clean skin closure. Most UK surgeons (181/206,87.9%) express equipoise in randomising patients for interventions in a potential platform trial evaluating SSI prevention. Conclusions Significant diversity characterizes global and subspecialty-specific practices in various SSI prevention measures, attributable to conflicting guidance and limited evidentiary support for recommendations. Encouragingly, a substantial number of surgeons express readiness to contribute to a robust evidence base through participation in potential platform trials for SSI prevention.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Royal London Hospital (GB), University Teaching Hospital (ZM), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.