FP2.3 - Is the Oakland score a reliable tool for safe discharge in lower gastrointestinal bleed patients?

Abstract Aim There are no NICE guidelines regarding safe discharge of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeds (LGIB). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the Oakland score, as suggested by the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines, in patients presenting with LGIB at William Harvey hospital. Methods Patients with LGIB who presented to A&E or inpatient referral from January to December 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Data was extracted from patient’s Sunrise documentation. The Oakland score for each patient was calculated. Those with a score of ≤8 were deemed safe for discharge; those with a higher score were deemed unsuitable. Patients’ admission, safe discharges and adverse outcomes, such as representation, blood transfusion, or further intervention, were investigated. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the Oakland score and adverse outcome was calculated. Results 123 patients were included. A total of 144 presentations to hospital, 29 had an Oakland score ≤8; 17 (58.6%) cases were safely discharged, 8 (27.6%) admitted and 4 (13.8%) represented. 115 had a score >8; 37 (32.2%) were safely discharged, 72 (62.6%) admitted and 41 (35.7%) experienced at least one adverse outcome. The AUROC for safe discharge was 0.84. Conclusion The Oakland score seems to be a safe and reliable tool for identifying LGIB patients who could be safely discharged home without hospital intervention. However, further research is required to assess whether a score >8 could be used as many higher risk patients did not experience adverse outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.349
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP2.3 - Is the Oakland score a reliable tool for safe discharge in lower gastrointestinal bleed patients?

J. A. Whiteway, Ankur D. Shah, Ka Tung Natalie Leong, Ho Yu Stephanie Yim
British journal of surgery
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

FP2.3 - Is the Oakland score a reliable tool for safe discharge in lower gastrointestinal bleed patients?

J. A. Whiteway, Ankur D. Shah, Ka Tung Natalie Leong, Ho Yu Stephanie Yim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim There are no NICE guidelines regarding safe discharge of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeds (LGIB). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the Oakland score, as suggested by the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines, in patients presenting with LGIB at William Harvey hospital. Methods Patients with LGIB who presented to A&E or inpatient referral from January to December 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Data was extracted from patient’s Sunrise documentation. The Oakland score for each patient was calculated. Those with a score of ≤8 were deemed safe for discharge; those with a higher score were deemed unsuitable. Patients’ admission, safe discharges and adverse outcomes, such as representation, blood transfusion, or further intervention, were investigated. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the Oakland score and adverse outcome was calculated. Results 123 patients were included. A total of 144 presentations to hospital, 29 had an Oakland score ≤8; 17 (58.6%) cases were safely discharged, 8 (27.6%) admitted and 4 (13.8%) represented. 115 had a score >8; 37 (32.2%) were safely discharged, 72 (62.6%) admitted and 41 (35.7%) experienced at least one adverse outcome. The AUROC for safe discharge was 0.84. Conclusion The Oakland score seems to be a safe and reliable tool for identifying LGIB patients who could be safely discharged home without hospital intervention. However, further research is required to assess whether a score >8 could be used as many higher risk patients did not experience adverse outcomes.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), East Cheshire NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.