WP3.16 - Comparing Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Initial Presentation versus In-hospital Incidence - A Single-Centre Investigation

Abstract Aims Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a gastrointestinal emergency with varied patient outcomes. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients whose primary admission presentation was AUGIB versus inpatients who subsequently developed AUGIB as a complication. Methods This was a retrospective study of all adult patients receiving endoscopy for AUGIB in a single surgical unit from September 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, laboratory results, medical history and clinical progress, 30 and 90-day mortality were compared. Results 145 patients were identified, 75 (51.7%) were male and median age was 65 years (IQR 53-75). 117 presented to hospital with AUGIB (group 1) and 28 developed AUGIB as an inpatient (group 2). Median length-of-stay was 3.3 vs 10 days, respectively (p=0.014). Group 2 were more likely to present with symptomatic anaemia (p=0.001), higher National Early Warning System scores (p<0.001), shock (p<0.001), higher Glasgow-Blatchford score (p<0.001) and require blood transfusions (p<0.001). Group 2 had higher ASA Scores (p<0.001) and higher 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. No statistical correlations were noted regarding the distribution of endoscopic diagnoses obtained between both groups.Group 1(n=117)Group 2(n=28)P-Value30-Day all-cause Mortality4 (3.4%)4 (14.3%)0.02490-Day all-cause Mortality9 (7.7%)8 (28.6)0.002 Conclusion Our results echo previous studies that patients who develop AUGIB whilst an inpatient have significantly poorer outcomes. Causation is likely multifactorial and warrants further study. It remains important to closely apply the AUGIB care bundle and early critical care input to optimize outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.149
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WP3.16 - Comparing Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Initial Presentation versus In-hospital Incidence - A Single-Centre Investigation

Khurram Khan, Mitesh J Nemade, Olayiwola M Adeoti, Shou Kee Ng
British journal of surgery
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

WP3.16 - Comparing Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Initial Presentation versus In-hospital Incidence - A Single-Centre Investigation

Khurram Khan, Mitesh J Nemade, Olayiwola M Adeoti, Shou Kee Ng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a gastrointestinal emergency with varied patient outcomes. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients whose primary admission presentation was AUGIB versus inpatients who subsequently developed AUGIB as a complication. Methods This was a retrospective study of all adult patients receiving endoscopy for AUGIB in a single surgical unit from September 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, laboratory results, medical history and clinical progress, 30 and 90-day mortality were compared. Results 145 patients were identified, 75 (51.7%) were male and median age was 65 years (IQR 53-75). 117 presented to hospital with AUGIB (group 1) and 28 developed AUGIB as an inpatient (group 2). Median length-of-stay was 3.3 vs 10 days, respectively (p=0.014). Group 2 were more likely to present with symptomatic anaemia (p=0.001), higher National Early Warning System scores (p<0.001), shock (p<0.001), higher Glasgow-Blatchford score (p<0.001) and require blood transfusions (p<0.001). Group 2 had higher ASA Scores (p<0.001) and higher 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. No statistical correlations were noted regarding the distribution of endoscopic diagnoses obtained between both groups.Group 1(n=117)Group 2(n=28)P-Value30-Day all-cause Mortality4 (3.4%)4 (14.3%)0.02490-Day all-cause Mortality9 (7.7%)8 (28.6)0.002 Conclusion Our results echo previous studies that patients who develop AUGIB whilst an inpatient have significantly poorer outcomes. Causation is likely multifactorial and warrants further study. It remains important to closely apply the AUGIB care bundle and early critical care input to optimize outcome.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
NHS Lanarkshire (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

WP3.16 - Comparing Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Initial Presentation versus In-hospital Incidence - A Single-Centre Investigation — Khurram Khan, Mitesh J Nemade, et al. · British journal of surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS