SP3.7 - Patient experiences of using wearable health monitors during cancer treatment: A qualitative study

Abstract Introduction Wearable health monitors (WHM) are being used in healthcare with increasing popularity, and offer a minimally invasive, ambulatory method of 24-hour monitoring. The aim of this study explores the patient experience of using WHMs during cancer treatment, including barriers and enablers of WHM use. Methods A phenomenological qualitative approach was used with single semi-structured interviews conducted in the form of focus groups with individuals enrolled in the EMBRaCE-GM study where WHMs are worn in the perioperative period of at least 6 months during treatment of either colorectal cancer, lung cancer, leukaemia/lymphoma or head & neck cancer. Results We identified 3 major themes of perceived patient benefit, treatment partnerships between patients and healthcare professions and barriers to the adoption. WHMs promoted positive behaviour change, prioritisation of own health and represented a form of “digital advocacy”. Potential barriers were aesthetic, experiential and technological. WHM introduction was time-sensitive, with patients finding their use acceptable at differing stages in their cancer pathway. Patients desired reciprocal interaction with WHMs and were less concerned with data accuracy. Discussion Our study identifies factors influencing a patient’s decision to use WHMs and their importance as a patient-centric interactive component of management. Novel findings include the optimal time to start wearing WHMs and that validity of measurements appears less of a concern for patients (in contrast to clinicians) who use wearable data and trends with their own experiences as part of a sense making exercise. Future work should focus on balancing patient and clinician expectations to provide guidance on the feasibility of WHM use in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.037
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP3.7 - Patient experiences of using wearable health monitors during cancer treatment: A qualitative study

Zoe Merchant, Sophie Collinson, Shannon Ingram-Walpole, Anthony Chan et al.
British journal of surgery
Cancer survivorship and care
article

SP3.7 - Patient experiences of using wearable health monitors during cancer treatment: A qualitative study

Zoe Merchant, Sophie Collinson, Shannon Ingram-Walpole, Anthony Chan, Corie Jackson, Anthony G. Wilson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Wearable health monitors (WHM) are being used in healthcare with increasing popularity, and offer a minimally invasive, ambulatory method of 24-hour monitoring. The aim of this study explores the patient experience of using WHMs during cancer treatment, including barriers and enablers of WHM use. Methods A phenomenological qualitative approach was used with single semi-structured interviews conducted in the form of focus groups with individuals enrolled in the EMBRaCE-GM study where WHMs are worn in the perioperative period of at least 6 months during treatment of either colorectal cancer, lung cancer, leukaemia/lymphoma or head & neck cancer. Results We identified 3 major themes of perceived patient benefit, treatment partnerships between patients and healthcare professions and barriers to the adoption. WHMs promoted positive behaviour change, prioritisation of own health and represented a form of “digital advocacy”. Potential barriers were aesthetic, experiential and technological. WHM introduction was time-sensitive, with patients finding their use acceptable at differing stages in their cancer pathway. Patients desired reciprocal interaction with WHMs and were less concerned with data accuracy. Discussion Our study identifies factors influencing a patient’s decision to use WHMs and their importance as a patient-centric interactive component of management. Novel findings include the optimal time to start wearing WHMs and that validity of measurements appears less of a concern for patients (in contrast to clinicians) who use wearable data and trends with their own experiences as part of a sense making exercise. Future work should focus on balancing patient and clinician expectations to provide guidance on the feasibility of WHM use in routine clinical practice.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.