Considerations on the Legal Position (Rights) of a Witness Remaining with a Party in a Partnership

The article aims to present the issue of protecting the rights of a witness who is a partner of a party to the proceedings. The presentation of the legal position of these persons in individual proceedings is based on the analysis of the right to refuse to testify and the right to refuse to answer a question. The key issue is to determine the subjective scope of the above-mentioned rights. Analyzing the provisions of criminal, civil and administrative proceedings, it can be concluded that only the Criminal Procedure Code covers persons living together subjectively. This means that this regulation will not only cover spouses but also persons who are cohabitants. A narrower scope for other procedures may entail procedural and evidentiary problems. The problem also concerns ailments and the method of imposing administrative fines. The article’s purpose is not only to present the problem but also to show a possible solution. Therefore, the postulate de lege ferenda was put forward, showing the potential ways of closing the legal loophole which gives a certain advantage to married persons over those who live only together.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2024.7.191-208
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations on the Legal Position (Rights) of a Witness Remaining with a Party in a Partnership

Konstanty Zaremba
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Considerations on the Legal Position (Rights) of a Witness Remaining with a Party in a Partnership

Konstanty Zaremba
article en

Abstract

The article aims to present the issue of protecting the rights of a witness who is a partner of a party to the proceedings. The presentation of the legal position of these persons in individual proceedings is based on the analysis of the right to refuse to testify and the right to refuse to answer a question. The key issue is to determine the subjective scope of the above-mentioned rights. Analyzing the provisions of criminal, civil and administrative proceedings, it can be concluded that only the Criminal Procedure Code covers persons living together subjectively. This means that this regulation will not only cover spouses but also persons who are cohabitants. A narrower scope for other procedures may entail procedural and evidentiary problems. The problem also concerns ailments and the method of imposing administrative fines. The article’s purpose is not only to present the problem but also to show a possible solution. Therefore, the postulate de lege ferenda was put forward, showing the potential ways of closing the legal loophole which gives a certain advantage to married persons over those who live only together.

Przegląd Prawa AdministracyjnegoVol. 7
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.