FP8.9 - Surgical Synergy: Rethinking waste for a greener tomorrow in General Surgery

Abstract Aims Every year in the UK, the NHS sends approximately 156,000 tonnes of clinical waste for processing via high temperature incineration or other treatments, and then to landfill sites. Majority of the waste produced by hospitals comes from the operating theatres (OTs). In this study, we aim to assess the current implementation of waste management strategies at an NHS district general hospital (DGH) in general surgery. We have investigated a variety of cases and have surveyed the volume of waste produced. Methods We observed elective and emergency general surgery cases across 2 weeks. For each case, we weighed the waste produced- both recyclable and non-recyclable (clinical). Results This study included four umbilical hernia repairs, two right hemicolectomies, one examination of rectum under anaesthesia with seton insertion and three laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Across the operations, the average total waste produced was 5.9kg. The average clinical waste and recyclable waste was 4.7kg and 1.2kg, respectively. Additionally, a significant proportion of non-infectious recyclable waste was incorrectly placed into the clinical waste bin. Conclusion On average 5.9kg of waste is produced after a general surgery operation. Most of this waste is clinical and not recycled. However, the clinical waste can be cut down by appropriate waste segregation, thus reducing the impact on the environment as well as reducing the cost of incineration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.421
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP8.9 - Surgical Synergy: Rethinking waste for a greener tomorrow in General Surgery

Vernon Sivarajah, Adam Hussein, Gita Lingam, Tahmid Kabir
British journal of surgery
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

FP8.9 - Surgical Synergy: Rethinking waste for a greener tomorrow in General Surgery

Vernon Sivarajah, Adam Hussein, Gita Lingam, Tahmid Kabir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Every year in the UK, the NHS sends approximately 156,000 tonnes of clinical waste for processing via high temperature incineration or other treatments, and then to landfill sites. Majority of the waste produced by hospitals comes from the operating theatres (OTs). In this study, we aim to assess the current implementation of waste management strategies at an NHS district general hospital (DGH) in general surgery. We have investigated a variety of cases and have surveyed the volume of waste produced. Methods We observed elective and emergency general surgery cases across 2 weeks. For each case, we weighed the waste produced- both recyclable and non-recyclable (clinical). Results This study included four umbilical hernia repairs, two right hemicolectomies, one examination of rectum under anaesthesia with seton insertion and three laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Across the operations, the average total waste produced was 5.9kg. The average clinical waste and recyclable waste was 4.7kg and 1.2kg, respectively. Additionally, a significant proportion of non-infectious recyclable waste was incorrectly placed into the clinical waste bin. Conclusion On average 5.9kg of waste is produced after a general surgery operation. Most of this waste is clinical and not recycled. However, the clinical waste can be cut down by appropriate waste segregation, thus reducing the impact on the environment as well as reducing the cost of incineration.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.