ThP6.6 - Enhancing Management Strategies: Exploring the Expansion of Low-Risk Criteria in Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Aims Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring (GBS) determines the need for further interventions in patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). We aimed to study whether we can safely expand low-risk criteria to patients with GBS 2 and manage them as urgent outpatient. Methods A retrospective study of consecutive adult patients who had inpatient endoscopy for AUGIB in a single surgical unit from September 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, GBS and endoscopic findings was analysed. Low-risk was defined as GBS 0-1 and high-risk as GBS ≥3. Results 150 patients were identified; 79 (58.7%) were male and median age of 63 years (IQR 53-76). Median total length-of-stay was 3.7 days (IQR 1.9=7.8). Similar to the low-risk group, patients with GBS 2 presented with lower range and frequency of symptoms as the high-risk group (p=0.0002). Severity correlated with admission haemoglobin (p=0.001) and urea count (p<0.0001) but not relevant comorbidities (p=0.560) and admission observations (p=0.456). The frequency of benign endoscopic findings in patients with GBS 2 were similar to the low-risk group with no malignant findings noted. This group also had similar rates of past and re-attendances for AUGIB and 30-day mortality of 0% to the low-risk group. Conclusion While our study has a small sample size, it suggests promising prospect that patients with GBS 2 may not need inpatient endoscopy. Future multi-centre studies are crucial to validate and strengthen this proposition. The potential advantages include decreased inpatient admissions, reduced healthcare costs, and alleviating pressures on emergency endoscopy unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.294
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ThP6.6 - Enhancing Management Strategies: Exploring the Expansion of Low-Risk Criteria in Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Khurram Khan, Olayiwola Moses Adeoti, Mitesh J Nemade, Shou Kee Ng
British journal of surgery
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

ThP6.6 - Enhancing Management Strategies: Exploring the Expansion of Low-Risk Criteria in Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Khurram Khan, Olayiwola Moses Adeoti, Mitesh J Nemade, Shou Kee Ng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring (GBS) determines the need for further interventions in patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). We aimed to study whether we can safely expand low-risk criteria to patients with GBS 2 and manage them as urgent outpatient. Methods A retrospective study of consecutive adult patients who had inpatient endoscopy for AUGIB in a single surgical unit from September 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, GBS and endoscopic findings was analysed. Low-risk was defined as GBS 0-1 and high-risk as GBS ≥3. Results 150 patients were identified; 79 (58.7%) were male and median age of 63 years (IQR 53-76). Median total length-of-stay was 3.7 days (IQR 1.9=7.8). Similar to the low-risk group, patients with GBS 2 presented with lower range and frequency of symptoms as the high-risk group (p=0.0002). Severity correlated with admission haemoglobin (p=0.001) and urea count (p<0.0001) but not relevant comorbidities (p=0.560) and admission observations (p=0.456). The frequency of benign endoscopic findings in patients with GBS 2 were similar to the low-risk group with no malignant findings noted. This group also had similar rates of past and re-attendances for AUGIB and 30-day mortality of 0% to the low-risk group. Conclusion While our study has a small sample size, it suggests promising prospect that patients with GBS 2 may not need inpatient endoscopy. Future multi-centre studies are crucial to validate and strengthen this proposition. The potential advantages include decreased inpatient admissions, reduced healthcare costs, and alleviating pressures on emergency endoscopy unit.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
NHS Lanarkshire (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.