FP6.9 - Improving Compliance & Implementation of the STAR Score at a tertiary level hospital in India: A continuous process

Abstract Aim To perform an audit to check the Quality and compliance of Surgical documentation using STAR Score at a tertiary hospital in India. Method A total of 90 case files were studied and assessed in detail from all surgical departments. The “STAR: Surgical tool for auditing records” tool was used to collect data accordingly. The results were compared with standard guidelines and further analyzed. A series of departmental training and implementation meetings were carried out. Three cycles were carried out and a re-audit was performed at the end of every cycle. Result The overall compliance score of the hospital was found to be 74%. While the departments of General surgery and orthopaedics showed a higher rate of compliance, each constituting 82%, Neurosurgery showed the least compliance at 62%. It was also seen that the maximum percentage of missing information constituted anaesthetic records and subsequent entries. At the end of 3 cycles, a considerable improvement was observed, with the compliance rate improving to 98% in all departments. Conclusion We believe that compliance and implementation of the STAR Score is mandatory, as it can significantly improve the quality of documentation and can be implemented universally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.397
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP6.9 - Improving Compliance & Implementation of the STAR Score at a tertiary level hospital in India: A continuous process

Akatya Sinha, Sameer Kadam
British journal of surgery
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

FP6.9 - Improving Compliance & Implementation of the STAR Score at a tertiary level hospital in India: A continuous process

Akatya Sinha, Sameer Kadam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim To perform an audit to check the Quality and compliance of Surgical documentation using STAR Score at a tertiary hospital in India. Method A total of 90 case files were studied and assessed in detail from all surgical departments. The “STAR: Surgical tool for auditing records” tool was used to collect data accordingly. The results were compared with standard guidelines and further analyzed. A series of departmental training and implementation meetings were carried out. Three cycles were carried out and a re-audit was performed at the end of every cycle. Result The overall compliance score of the hospital was found to be 74%. While the departments of General surgery and orthopaedics showed a higher rate of compliance, each constituting 82%, Neurosurgery showed the least compliance at 62%. It was also seen that the maximum percentage of missing information constituted anaesthetic records and subsequent entries. At the end of 3 cycles, a considerable improvement was observed, with the compliance rate improving to 98% in all departments. Conclusion We believe that compliance and implementation of the STAR Score is mandatory, as it can significantly improve the quality of documentation and can be implemented universally.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Mahatma Gandhi Mission Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.