WP6.13 - REINVENT- Robotic SurgEry: INnoVation for EfficieNt Training- A qualitative study assessing training in RAS (Robotic Assisted Surgery) and future implementation

Abstract Introduction Despite the rise in use of RAS in UK surgical practice, concerns have been reported regarding the lack of standardisation in training. Little is known on the current exposure to RAS training in the UK and thoughts on how training should be delivered in the future. Methods Semi-structured interviews were completed in person/online with four stakeholder groups:(1) pan speciality surgical trainees; (2) robotic trainers; (3) leads in curriculum development; (4) RAS industry leads. Respondents were pan-speciality and from across the UK. Topic guides focussed on personal perspectives on RAS training, current barriers to accessing training and views on how RAS training can be optimally delivered in the future. Data collection ceased upon saturation in themes and were analysed thematically. Results Twenty-seven informants were interviewed, including 8 trainees, 7 curriculum developers, 6 robotic surgeons and 6 industry leads. Respondents reported multiple challenges in training including barriers to accessing the robot such as the geographical location of the systems; the consultant RAS learning needs; equality and diversity issues and challenges with delivering platform agnostic training. However, respondents reported an anticipated growth in RAS and a need for the surgical training bodies to invest in structured RAS training which should be implemented earlier in surgical training. Discussion RAS training in the UK requires overcoming several barriers to deliver equitable, standardised training. A further study is required to reach a consensus amongst stakeholders on how RAS should be delivered within the current infrastructure of both the UK health care system and surgical training climate.