BJS 1 - Endoscopic histopathology results in patients undergoing oesophageal cell collection device and biomarker testing for Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance

Abstract Aims Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services, yet is fundamental to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett’s surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett’s patients requiring urgent endoscopy. Methods All patients undergoing OCCD testing using Cytosponge(TM) for Barrett’s surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorise patients into risk groups: endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high-risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. Results 4204 Barrett’s OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients had an endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett’s segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test (p<0.001). 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this relays to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high-risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no missed cancers within 12 months of OCCD test in our cohort. Conclusions OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk Barrett’s surveillance patients requiring further investigation with urgent UGI endoscopy within the real-world setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.004
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BJS 1 - Endoscopic histopathology results in patients undergoing oesophageal cell collection device and biomarker testing for Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance

Grant Fullarton, Siobhan Chien, Paul Glen
British journal of surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

BJS 1 - Endoscopic histopathology results in patients undergoing oesophageal cell collection device and biomarker testing for Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance

Grant Fullarton, Siobhan Chien, Paul Glen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services, yet is fundamental to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett’s surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett’s patients requiring urgent endoscopy. Methods All patients undergoing OCCD testing using Cytosponge(TM) for Barrett’s surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorise patients into risk groups: endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high-risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. Results 4204 Barrett’s OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients had an endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett’s segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test (p<0.001). 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this relays to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high-risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no missed cancers within 12 months of OCCD test in our cohort. Conclusions OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk Barrett’s surveillance patients requiring further investigation with urgent UGI endoscopy within the real-world setting.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.