Assessing Heterogeneity Among Cyclists Towards Importance of Bicycle Infrastructural Elements in Urban Areas

Promoting bicycling and making it attractive requires appropriate infrastructure. Sociodemographic characteristics, frequency and experiences of bike use, and purpose of bicycle trips can affect preferences towards bicycle infrastructure facilities in urban areas. Hence, this study aims to explore the heterogeneity in the perceived importance of bicycle infrastructure facility attributes in various cyclist groups based on gender, age, weekly biking frequency, daily cycling distance, cycling experience, and bicycle trip purpose. Data were collected from bicycle users through a questionnaire disseminated via social media platforms and QR code brochures distributed in Hasselt, Belgium. A 5-point Likert-type ordinal scale was used to collect data on the perceived importance of bicycle infrastructure facility indicators. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank the indicators. At the same time, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to verify the heterogeneity among the groups. The findings reveal that bicycle infrastructure, i.e., bicycle lanes or paths, is the most critical variable, while the slope was considered the least important. No heterogeneity was found regarding the importance of bicycle infrastructure indicators based on gender. However, heterogeneity was observed based on age, daily bicycle use, cycling experience, weekly bicycle use, and bicycle trip purpose. The findings of this research help urban and transport planners develop improvement strategies for the city’s existing bicycling facilities and prioritize future developments by considering various cyclist groups’ preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9090153
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Heterogeneity Among Cyclists Towards Importance of Bicycle Infrastructural Elements in Urban Areas

Davy Janssens, Ali Pirdavani, Tufail Ahmed, Geert Wets
5 citations
Infrastructures
Urban Transport and Accessibility
3.42
article

Assessing Heterogeneity Among Cyclists Towards Importance of Bicycle Infrastructural Elements in Urban Areas

Davy Janssens, Ali Pirdavani, Tufail Ahmed, Geert Wets
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Promoting bicycling and making it attractive requires appropriate infrastructure. Sociodemographic characteristics, frequency and experiences of bike use, and purpose of bicycle trips can affect preferences towards bicycle infrastructure facilities in urban areas. Hence, this study aims to explore the heterogeneity in the perceived importance of bicycle infrastructure facility attributes in various cyclist groups based on gender, age, weekly biking frequency, daily cycling distance, cycling experience, and bicycle trip purpose. Data were collected from bicycle users through a questionnaire disseminated via social media platforms and QR code brochures distributed in Hasselt, Belgium. A 5-point Likert-type ordinal scale was used to collect data on the perceived importance of bicycle infrastructure facility indicators. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank the indicators. At the same time, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to verify the heterogeneity among the groups. The findings reveal that bicycle infrastructure, i.e., bicycle lanes or paths, is the most critical variable, while the slope was considered the least important. No heterogeneity was found regarding the importance of bicycle infrastructure indicators based on gender. However, heterogeneity was observed based on age, daily bicycle use, cycling experience, weekly bicycle use, and bicycle trip purpose. The findings of this research help urban and transport planners develop improvement strategies for the city’s existing bicycling facilities and prioritize future developments by considering various cyclist groups’ preferences.

InfrastructuresVol. 9(9)
Hasselt University (BE)
Universiteit Hasselt
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.