H022 Measuring interaction and influence among health professionals within a Huntington’s disease clinic: a social network approach

<h3>Background</h3> Interactions within multidisciplinary teams can underpin improved care integration and outcomes for people living with Huntington’s disease (HD). Social network analysis, based on graph theory, provides a tool to measure interaction and influence within these inter-professional networks. Aim: To measure interaction and influence among health professionals within a HD clinic using social network analysis. <h3>Methods</h3> This study was conducted at a publicly funded multidisciplinary HD clinic in Victoria, Australia. Re-development in 2016-2017 led to transition from a neurologist-led to a more collaborative service delivery. We adopted a retrospective before (Year 2014-2015; n=339) and after (Year 2018-2019; n=346) cohort design. Patient-related interaction data was manually extracted from medical records, then exported for analysis in R. The network analysis included interaction correlations, Walktrap community detection (based on the idea that short random walks tend to stay in the same community), and local (degree, closeness, betweenness) and global (PageRank) centrality. <h3>Results</h3> There were more of stronger positive interaction correlations in the After cohort (between physiotherapist and occupational therapist (OT) (r=0.57); speech pathologist (SP) and dietician (r=0.47); SP and OT (r=0.45); physiotherapist and SP (r=0.41); OT and dietician (r=0.41)) compared from the Before cohort (SP and dietician (r=0.53); neurologist and clinical liaison (r=0.38)). Walktrap algorithm detected three unconnected communities in the Before cohort, while the After cohort had two communities (one larger-sized) connected through the neurologist (Figure 1). The most influential professionals in the After cohort were neurologist (highest degree=7 and betweenness=22) [most social connections and control over information flow, respectively], clinical liaison (lowest closeness=0.27) [closest to other professionals], and dietician (highest PageRank=0.15) [most in-links from important professionals]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study showed a social network approach to measure interaction and influence among health professionals within a HD clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-ehdn.252
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

H022 Measuring interaction and influence among health professionals within a Huntington’s disease clinic: a social network approach

Ruth Hosken, Thanh G. Phan, Yenni Lie, Julie C. Stout et al.
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

H022 Measuring interaction and influence among health professionals within a Huntington’s disease clinic: a social network approach

Ruth Hosken, Thanh G. Phan, Yenni Lie, Julie C. Stout, Susan Mathers, Emily Mercieca, Henry Ma, Yufei Xu
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Interactions within multidisciplinary teams can underpin improved care integration and outcomes for people living with Huntington’s disease (HD). Social network analysis, based on graph theory, provides a tool to measure interaction and influence within these inter-professional networks. Aim: To measure interaction and influence among health professionals within a HD clinic using social network analysis. <h3>Methods</h3> This study was conducted at a publicly funded multidisciplinary HD clinic in Victoria, Australia. Re-development in 2016-2017 led to transition from a neurologist-led to a more collaborative service delivery. We adopted a retrospective before (Year 2014-2015; n=339) and after (Year 2018-2019; n=346) cohort design. Patient-related interaction data was manually extracted from medical records, then exported for analysis in R. The network analysis included interaction correlations, Walktrap community detection (based on the idea that short random walks tend to stay in the same community), and local (degree, closeness, betweenness) and global (PageRank) centrality. <h3>Results</h3> There were more of stronger positive interaction correlations in the After cohort (between physiotherapist and occupational therapist (OT) (r=0.57); speech pathologist (SP) and dietician (r=0.47); SP and OT (r=0.45); physiotherapist and SP (r=0.41); OT and dietician (r=0.41)) compared from the Before cohort (SP and dietician (r=0.53); neurologist and clinical liaison (r=0.38)). Walktrap algorithm detected three unconnected communities in the Before cohort, while the After cohort had two communities (one larger-sized) connected through the neurologist (Figure 1). The most influential professionals in the After cohort were neurologist (highest degree=7 and betweenness=22) [most social connections and control over information flow, respectively], clinical liaison (lowest closeness=0.27) [closest to other professionals], and dietician (highest PageRank=0.15) [most in-links from important professionals]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study showed a social network approach to measure interaction and influence among health professionals within a HD clinic.

Calvary Health Care Bethlehem (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.