SP3.9 - Evaluating the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing resections for colorectal cancer

Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), often associated with delayed recovery. Prehabilitation is a trimodal service aimed at optimising the physical, nutritional, and psychological wellbeing of patients prior to surgery. This study aims to compare the effect of prehabilitation on patient outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective surgical resections for CRC at a tertiary centre between January-July 2022, categorised in two groups: standard pre-op care (non-prehab) vs those getting prehabilitation (prehab). Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and post-operative complications (Clavien Dindo classification). Secondary goals were to identify proportion of patients received screening for nutrition and diabetic control. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Ninety-five patients were included (54 males, 41 females). 76% (n=71) were referred for prehabilitation. Median time to the first prehabilitation appointment was 7 days (IQR 0-61). LOS was reduced by one day (prehab 8 days, non-prehab 9 days, p=0.186). This equated to cost saving of £41,606 in the prehab group (£586.00 per day). Patients in the prehab group developed fewer post-operative complications (46%, n=33) compared to the non-prehab group (67%, n=16), p=0.042) Based on Clavien-Dindo classification, non-prehab group developed more severe post-operative complications compared to prehab (CD 4-5, 4% vs 0% respectively). Only 41% patients of the whole cohort (n=39) had nutritional bloods taken and 57% (n=54) were screened for diabetes. Conclusion Prehabilitation is useful in reducing post-operative complications rates and inpatient expenses. Future studies may improve on optimising nutrition and diabetic control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.038
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP3.9 - Evaluating the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing resections for colorectal cancer

Humaira Yasmin, Ahsan Javed, Nora Wangari Murage, Khaled Noureldin et al.
British journal of surgery
Cancer survivorship and care
article

SP3.9 - Evaluating the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing resections for colorectal cancer

Humaira Yasmin, Ahsan Javed, Nora Wangari Murage, Khaled Noureldin, Shakil Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), often associated with delayed recovery. Prehabilitation is a trimodal service aimed at optimising the physical, nutritional, and psychological wellbeing of patients prior to surgery. This study aims to compare the effect of prehabilitation on patient outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective surgical resections for CRC at a tertiary centre between January-July 2022, categorised in two groups: standard pre-op care (non-prehab) vs those getting prehabilitation (prehab). Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and post-operative complications (Clavien Dindo classification). Secondary goals were to identify proportion of patients received screening for nutrition and diabetic control. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Ninety-five patients were included (54 males, 41 females). 76% (n=71) were referred for prehabilitation. Median time to the first prehabilitation appointment was 7 days (IQR 0-61). LOS was reduced by one day (prehab 8 days, non-prehab 9 days, p=0.186). This equated to cost saving of £41,606 in the prehab group (£586.00 per day). Patients in the prehab group developed fewer post-operative complications (46%, n=33) compared to the non-prehab group (67%, n=16), p=0.042) Based on Clavien-Dindo classification, non-prehab group developed more severe post-operative complications compared to prehab (CD 4-5, 4% vs 0% respectively). Only 41% patients of the whole cohort (n=39) had nutritional bloods taken and 57% (n=54) were screened for diabetes. Conclusion Prehabilitation is useful in reducing post-operative complications rates and inpatient expenses. Future studies may improve on optimising nutrition and diabetic control.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
University of Liverpool (GB), Royal Liverpool University Hospital (GB), Cairo University hospitals (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.