SP2.7 - A Consultant General Surgeon's approach to evaluating malnutrition in emergencies: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Patients undergoing an emergency laparotomy are often malnourished. Identifying malnourished patients is a prerequisite to offering targeted nutritional support. This study explores how consultants identify malnourished patients, why they use that approach and the barriers experienced. Methods General surgical consultants involved in emergency surgery were invited. We used purposive sampling to ensure a broad representation of consultant experience across different practice settings. Following ethical approval (UREC 050436), semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audio-visually recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were coded and analysed in NVivo. A framework was developed and reviewed by an independent researcher and supervising team. Interviews continued until saturation. Results Eighteen interviews were conducted (14 male, consultant experience 6 months-23 years) across three hospital settings (4 district general, 10 teaching, 4 intestinal failure unit). Identifying malnutrition consisted of three themes: ‘surgeon’ (knowledge, experience, planning ahead); ‘patient’ (selection, composition, clinical progress, operative considerations); and ‘institution’ (collaboration, extended surgical team). Three themes also encompass the barriers experienced: ‘surgeon’ (understanding, culture, ownership, time constraints); ‘institution’ (provision, staffing, conflict, hospital setting); and ‘wider context’ (research, external factors). These influenced clinical decision making, which had two themes; ‘to join or not to join’ (risk taking, site of anastomosis) and ‘nutritional support’ (timing, delivery). Discussion This study highlights a range of barriers that consultants experience when assessing patients for malnutrition, which affects operative and clinical decision making. It provides a framework upon which issues can be addressed by surgeons and policy makers in order to improve outcomes for malnourished patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.028
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP2.7 - A Consultant General Surgeon's approach to evaluating malnutrition in emergencies: a qualitative study

Daniel Mark Baker, Daniel Ashmore, Matthew M.Y. Lee, Vanessa Halliday et al.
British journal of surgery
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

SP2.7 - A Consultant General Surgeon's approach to evaluating malnutrition in emergencies: a qualitative study

Daniel Mark Baker, Daniel Ashmore, Matthew M.Y. Lee, Vanessa Halliday, Tim Wilson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients undergoing an emergency laparotomy are often malnourished. Identifying malnourished patients is a prerequisite to offering targeted nutritional support. This study explores how consultants identify malnourished patients, why they use that approach and the barriers experienced. Methods General surgical consultants involved in emergency surgery were invited. We used purposive sampling to ensure a broad representation of consultant experience across different practice settings. Following ethical approval (UREC 050436), semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audio-visually recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were coded and analysed in NVivo. A framework was developed and reviewed by an independent researcher and supervising team. Interviews continued until saturation. Results Eighteen interviews were conducted (14 male, consultant experience 6 months-23 years) across three hospital settings (4 district general, 10 teaching, 4 intestinal failure unit). Identifying malnutrition consisted of three themes: ‘surgeon’ (knowledge, experience, planning ahead); ‘patient’ (selection, composition, clinical progress, operative considerations); and ‘institution’ (collaboration, extended surgical team). Three themes also encompass the barriers experienced: ‘surgeon’ (understanding, culture, ownership, time constraints); ‘institution’ (provision, staffing, conflict, hospital setting); and ‘wider context’ (research, external factors). These influenced clinical decision making, which had two themes; ‘to join or not to join’ (risk taking, site of anastomosis) and ‘nutritional support’ (timing, delivery). Discussion This study highlights a range of barriers that consultants experience when assessing patients for malnutrition, which affects operative and clinical decision making. It provides a framework upon which issues can be addressed by surgeons and policy makers in order to improve outcomes for malnourished patients.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.