WP3.9 - Characteristics and outcomes of an emergency hot clinic in a district general hospital - are they still a useful resource?

Abstract Introduction Hot clinics with ambulatory imaging have become integral to service provision in emergency general surgery, reducing admissions and expediting diagnoses. However they can come under criticism over a lack of senior decision making and perceived unnecessary reviews. Aims We aimed to evaluate the service in our department, by characterising the seniority level of the decision makers and assessors in the hot clinic, and outcomes of patients seen. Methods Retrospective analysis over a 3 month period of patients seen in the hot clinic of a district general hospital was performed. Results Total number of patients seen was 128. Median time from referral to appointment was 1 day. Abdominal pain formed 70.3% original presenting complaints. Over half of patients (52.3%, n=67) had review arranged by a registrar, and 46.9% (n=60) of patients were seen by a registrar at their appointment. 7% (n=9) had their hot clinic review arranged by a consultant. 63.3% (n=81) of patients had imaging performed as part of their review, and 53.1% (n =43) of these patients had pathology identified. 13.3% (n=17) of patients seen at the clinic required admission, and 43.0% (n=55) were discharged. 21.4% (n=3) of those brought back for a further hot clinic review had been seen by a consultant, versus 64.3% (n=9) seen by a registrar. Discussion Hot clinics are a valuable resource, and in our department a senior decision maker at a registrar level is involved in majority of decision making. The admission rate is low, demonstrating that the service is effective in helping to avoid admissions. Consultant input can help avoid repeated reviews.