WP1.10 - Are we Appropriately Consenting Patients for the Risks of Post Operative Urinary Retention following Groin Hernia Surgery?

Abstract Aims Consent is a fundamental process within surgery. General Medical Council (GMC) guidance advises that any recognised risks of harm resulting from a procedure should be discussed. Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequently encountered risk following groin hernia surgery, yet it can be missed when consenting. We aimed to review how frequently POUR occurs following groin hernia surgery in our hospital, along with how frequently it was consented for. Methods Retrospective data was collected on all patients undergoing planned groin hernia surgery in a single centre over a 6-month period between March and August 2023 . Data was collected on demographics, post-operative complications including POUR, and any other complications requiring hospital re-admission within 30 days. Consent forms were reviewed to identify whether POUR was documented as a risk. Results 128 groin hernia surgeries were carried out over the 6-month period. 13 patients (10.2%) experienced POUR, which was the most common complication in this group of patients. 7 of these patients did not have POUR documented as a risk factor on their consent. With only 46% overall having POUR documented as a risk factor on their consent. Conclusion Despite POUR being a common complication following groin hernia surgery, patients are often not being informed of this as part of the consent process. As over half of those patients who did experience POUR were not warned about this potential complication. Considering its frequency and potential impact on patients, improvements in consenting for POUR should be made.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.120
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WP1.10 - Are we Appropriately Consenting Patients for the Risks of Post Operative Urinary Retention following Groin Hernia Surgery?

Kayleigh Spellar, David Bunting, Alex Laurie
1 links
British journal of surgery
Ethics in medical practice
article

WP1.10 - Are we Appropriately Consenting Patients for the Risks of Post Operative Urinary Retention following Groin Hernia Surgery?

Kayleigh Spellar, David Bunting, Alex Laurie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Consent is a fundamental process within surgery. General Medical Council (GMC) guidance advises that any recognised risks of harm resulting from a procedure should be discussed. Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequently encountered risk following groin hernia surgery, yet it can be missed when consenting. We aimed to review how frequently POUR occurs following groin hernia surgery in our hospital, along with how frequently it was consented for. Methods Retrospective data was collected on all patients undergoing planned groin hernia surgery in a single centre over a 6-month period between March and August 2023 . Data was collected on demographics, post-operative complications including POUR, and any other complications requiring hospital re-admission within 30 days. Consent forms were reviewed to identify whether POUR was documented as a risk. Results 128 groin hernia surgeries were carried out over the 6-month period. 13 patients (10.2%) experienced POUR, which was the most common complication in this group of patients. 7 of these patients did not have POUR documented as a risk factor on their consent. With only 46% overall having POUR documented as a risk factor on their consent. Conclusion Despite POUR being a common complication following groin hernia surgery, patients are often not being informed of this as part of the consent process. As over half of those patients who did experience POUR were not warned about this potential complication. Considering its frequency and potential impact on patients, improvements in consenting for POUR should be made.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

WP1.10 - Are we Appropriately Consenting Patients for the Risks of Post Operative Urinary Retention following Groin Hernia Surgery? — Kayleigh Spellar, David Bunting, et al. · British journal of surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS