FP4.5 - An assessment of web-based patient information on bowel resection in Crohn's disease

Abstract Aim Most patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) have at least one bowel resection during their lifetime. 80% of patients with terminal ileal CD (the most common phenotype) will require a bowel resection at some point. Patients considering a bowel resection for CD will likely look for information online, as is common practice among patients with chronic illnesses. The aim of this study is to assess the quality and readability of web-based patient information on bowel resection for CD. Methods GoogleTM was searched using pre-defined search terms that were developed with input from patient experts. For each term, results from the first two pages were screened for eligibility. Patient-focused websites on bowel resection for CD were included. The quality of the information was assessed using the DISCERN tool, and the readability with the Flesch-Kincaid ease of readability (FK) score. Results Of the 118 sources identified, 91 were excluded and 27 sources were analysed. A third (n=10) did not discuss the different types of resections. Ileocaecal resection (the most commonly performed resection) was described in 7 sources. Discussion of management post-resection (n=7) and of lifestyle changes (n=12) were sparse. There were some instances of factually incorrect information. The mean DISCERN score was 3.2±0.31 (range 1-5), indicating moderate quality information. The mean FK score was 49.9 (corresponding to “difficult to read”). Conclusion Professional bodies and clinicians should work alongside patient groups to develop online sources which are in appropriate lay language and evidence-based, and suit patients’ informational needs to aid patient decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.374
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP4.5 - An assessment of web-based patient information on bowel resection in Crohn's disease

Nilofer Husnoo, Judith Johnston, Alexandra Whitman
British journal of surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

FP4.5 - An assessment of web-based patient information on bowel resection in Crohn's disease

Nilofer Husnoo, Judith Johnston, Alexandra Whitman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Most patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) have at least one bowel resection during their lifetime. 80% of patients with terminal ileal CD (the most common phenotype) will require a bowel resection at some point. Patients considering a bowel resection for CD will likely look for information online, as is common practice among patients with chronic illnesses. The aim of this study is to assess the quality and readability of web-based patient information on bowel resection for CD. Methods GoogleTM was searched using pre-defined search terms that were developed with input from patient experts. For each term, results from the first two pages were screened for eligibility. Patient-focused websites on bowel resection for CD were included. The quality of the information was assessed using the DISCERN tool, and the readability with the Flesch-Kincaid ease of readability (FK) score. Results Of the 118 sources identified, 91 were excluded and 27 sources were analysed. A third (n=10) did not discuss the different types of resections. Ileocaecal resection (the most commonly performed resection) was described in 7 sources. Discussion of management post-resection (n=7) and of lifestyle changes (n=12) were sparse. There were some instances of factually incorrect information. The mean DISCERN score was 3.2±0.31 (range 1-5), indicating moderate quality information. The mean FK score was 49.9 (corresponding to “difficult to read”). Conclusion Professional bodies and clinicians should work alongside patient groups to develop online sources which are in appropriate lay language and evidence-based, and suit patients’ informational needs to aid patient decision making.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
University Teaching Hospital (ZM), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.