SP4.4 - Gallbladder Cancer: Radical Surgery and Prognosis

Abstract Introduction The prognosis for gallbladder cancer remains unfavorable, with advanced forms not being uncommon. This prospective study aims to assess outcomes based on the tumor stage and prognostic factors. Materials and Methods Patients with gallbladder cancer were included in a retrospective study, during which factors influencing the type of resection were considered, and prognostic factors were analyzed. We used the biomedical statistics software SPSS24 and Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, with the calculation of the P-value (Pearson's test). Results One hundred and eighty-five patients were included in this retrospective study, with an average age of 62 years. In 24 patients, simple cholecystectomy was deemed sufficient, while radical cholecystectomy involving the gallbladder bed with lymphadenectomy was performed in 27 patients. Seventy-nine patients underwent hepatic resection (S4b–S5), and bile duct resection was necessary in 12 patients. Due to local and metastatic extension, 43 patients received palliative treatment. R0 resection was possible in 71.3% of cases. Two early reoperations were necessary, one for bleeding from the hepatic edge and the other for an abscess. T3 or T2 tumors with lymph node invasion underwent adjuvant treatment. The recurrence rate was 14.5%. The three-year survival, across all stages, was 73.4%. Conclusion Radical surgery of gallbladder cancer is not always possible. The tumor stage and type of resection influence the survival rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.044
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP4.4 - Gallbladder Cancer: Radical Surgery and Prognosis

Badreddine Nini, Abdelhak Lamara
British journal of surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

SP4.4 - Gallbladder Cancer: Radical Surgery and Prognosis

Badreddine Nini, Abdelhak Lamara
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The prognosis for gallbladder cancer remains unfavorable, with advanced forms not being uncommon. This prospective study aims to assess outcomes based on the tumor stage and prognostic factors. Materials and Methods Patients with gallbladder cancer were included in a retrospective study, during which factors influencing the type of resection were considered, and prognostic factors were analyzed. We used the biomedical statistics software SPSS24 and Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, with the calculation of the P-value (Pearson's test). Results One hundred and eighty-five patients were included in this retrospective study, with an average age of 62 years. In 24 patients, simple cholecystectomy was deemed sufficient, while radical cholecystectomy involving the gallbladder bed with lymphadenectomy was performed in 27 patients. Seventy-nine patients underwent hepatic resection (S4b–S5), and bile duct resection was necessary in 12 patients. Due to local and metastatic extension, 43 patients received palliative treatment. R0 resection was possible in 71.3% of cases. Two early reoperations were necessary, one for bleeding from the hepatic edge and the other for an abscess. T3 or T2 tumors with lymph node invasion underwent adjuvant treatment. The recurrence rate was 14.5%. The three-year survival, across all stages, was 73.4%. Conclusion Radical surgery of gallbladder cancer is not always possible. The tumor stage and type of resection influence the survival rate.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Military University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.