SP8.1 - Emergency Robotic General Surgery in the UK: Operations, Staff, and Missed Opportunities

Abstract Aims The primary aim was to determine the volume of emergency robotic general surgery performed in the UK. Secondary aims were to determine compatible operations with opportunities for training and the availability of robotic-trained staff. Methods Freedom of Information (FOI) requests were sent to 122 UK Acute Trusts, asking for data on general surgery procedures (open, laparoscopic, robotic) from January 2019 to January 2023. Data on common emergency procedures, in-patient length of stay, robotic complications, and availability of robotically trained staff was requested. Results Of the 122 Acute Trusts, 22 did not respond (82% response rate), 32 had no general surgery robotic access, 16 could not comply due to cost (under section 12 of FOI Act), and 52 provided data. Fifteen Trusts performed emergency robotic surgeries: cholecystectomy (262 cases), hernia repair (140), and appendectomy (3). 86% of these Trusts utilized the DaVinci system, while the CMR Versius system was employed by the remaining 14%. There was a median of 12.5 (range 2-40) robotic-trained staff in-hours, versus a median of 0 (range 0-4) out-of-hours. Conclusions Emergency robotic general surgery in the UK is limited by financial constraints, staff availability, and selective procedural use. Compatible emergency operations that have been performed were cholecystectomies, hernias, and appendectomies. To expand its role, there's a need for training, infrastructure investment, and further research into the cost-effectiveness and outcomes of robotic surgery in emergency cases.