EP33 - Nil by mouth in GI surgery: are we starving our patients longer than we need to?

Abstract Aim Fluid intake preoperatively reduces postoperative nausea, vomiting and headache, and oral intake allows the patient to be metabolically active to respond better to surgery. However, a known risk to oral intake preoperatively is aspiration. Current guidelines state that a patient should be fasted from 6 hours preoperatively and should take clear fluids up to 2 hours preoperatively. We assessed how long GI patients admitted to the Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) remained nil by mouth (NBM). Method Data was collected throughout November from SAU. Inclusion criteria was GI surgical patients and exclusion criteria was patients on home leave. We used electronic and paper notes to determine how long patients were kept NBM and their surgical outcome. We assumed that a patient was kept NBM from their admission (as per local protocol), until either noted to no longer be NBM, having surgery or being discharged. Results 50 patients were identified. We found that only 20% of patients kept nil by mouth went on to have surgery. Of the remaining 80%, 60% were kept nil by mouth for >6 hours, with no surgical procedures. Conclusions Many patients are kept NBM unnecessarily. We need to reduce this as well as the time patients are starved. Furthermore, clearer documentation is needed for commencing patients NBM, and when they can resume eating. We can move away from the culture of prolonged fasting in surgical patients by improving organisation and planning as well as increasing education on preoperative fasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.432
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP33 - Nil by mouth in GI surgery: are we starving our patients longer than we need to?

Daniel Hern
British journal of surgery
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

EP33 - Nil by mouth in GI surgery: are we starving our patients longer than we need to?

Daniel Hern
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Fluid intake preoperatively reduces postoperative nausea, vomiting and headache, and oral intake allows the patient to be metabolically active to respond better to surgery. However, a known risk to oral intake preoperatively is aspiration. Current guidelines state that a patient should be fasted from 6 hours preoperatively and should take clear fluids up to 2 hours preoperatively. We assessed how long GI patients admitted to the Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) remained nil by mouth (NBM). Method Data was collected throughout November from SAU. Inclusion criteria was GI surgical patients and exclusion criteria was patients on home leave. We used electronic and paper notes to determine how long patients were kept NBM and their surgical outcome. We assumed that a patient was kept NBM from their admission (as per local protocol), until either noted to no longer be NBM, having surgery or being discharged. Results 50 patients were identified. We found that only 20% of patients kept nil by mouth went on to have surgery. Of the remaining 80%, 60% were kept nil by mouth for >6 hours, with no surgical procedures. Conclusions Many patients are kept NBM unnecessarily. We need to reduce this as well as the time patients are starved. Furthermore, clearer documentation is needed for commencing patients NBM, and when they can resume eating. We can move away from the culture of prolonged fasting in surgical patients by improving organisation and planning as well as increasing education on preoperative fasting.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Consortium for DEWATS Dissemination Society (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.