FP2.9 - Colonoscopy perforation: a single centre study

Abstract Aim Colonoscopy is increasing utilized as a diagnostic & therapeutic tool. Colonoscopy perforation is reported to occur in 1/1500 (diagnostic colonoscopy), 1/500 (polypectomy) & 1/50 (EMR) procedures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the management of colonoscopy perforation at a single centre. Methods Colonoscopy is carried out on patients with colorectal cancer trigger symptoms (altered bowel habit, rectal bleeding, weight loss, abdominal pain, anaemia, ano-rectal symptoms, etc), family history screening, colorectal cancer & polyp surveillance. This is cohort study carried out since 2012 to December 2023 on all colonoscopy perforations carried out at a single centre. Results N = 22 Age (yrs) 70.8 ± 3.4 Sex (M:F) 4 : 18 BMI (kg/m2) 25.3 ± 1.8 ASA 2 Sigmoid Perf site (n) 13 LOS (days) 6 ± 6.5 Deaths (n) 30 day 3 60 day 3 90 day 3 IBD (n) 3 DD (n) 11 WCC (x109/L) 11.3 ± 1.4 CRP (mg/L) 100.1 ± 25.7 Lactate (mmol/L) 1.3 ± 0.7 Op time (mins) 119.0 ± 15.3 Bx 6 Polypectomy 5 Colonoscopy 21 (9 incomplete) Flexi siggy 1 Sedation 16 Entonox 5 GA 1 Xray 10 CT scan 22 Conservative 9 Surgery 13 Stoma (n) 6 Lap 2 Lap open 2 Open 9 Conclusion Colonic perforation during colonoscopy is increased in: polypectomy (especially right colonic), therapeutic EMR, diseased bowel (IBD inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease), & in challenging colons. The management of colonoscopy perforation should individualized with early clinical & radiological diagnosis. Site and size of colonic perforation determines management. Good bowel preparations, minimizes contamination and therefore allows safe conservative management of small colonoscopy perforation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.355
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP2.9 - Colonoscopy perforation: a single centre study

Komal Riaz, M Bughio, Masooma Zaidi, M A Gok et al.
British journal of surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

FP2.9 - Colonoscopy perforation: a single centre study

Komal Riaz, M Bughio, Masooma Zaidi, M A Gok, M M Sadat, Nicola Mathieson, U A Khan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Colonoscopy is increasing utilized as a diagnostic & therapeutic tool. Colonoscopy perforation is reported to occur in 1/1500 (diagnostic colonoscopy), 1/500 (polypectomy) & 1/50 (EMR) procedures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the management of colonoscopy perforation at a single centre. Methods Colonoscopy is carried out on patients with colorectal cancer trigger symptoms (altered bowel habit, rectal bleeding, weight loss, abdominal pain, anaemia, ano-rectal symptoms, etc), family history screening, colorectal cancer & polyp surveillance. This is cohort study carried out since 2012 to December 2023 on all colonoscopy perforations carried out at a single centre. Results N = 22 Age (yrs) 70.8 ± 3.4 Sex (M:F) 4 : 18 BMI (kg/m2) 25.3 ± 1.8 ASA 2 Sigmoid Perf site (n) 13 LOS (days) 6 ± 6.5 Deaths (n) 30 day 3 60 day 3 90 day 3 IBD (n) 3 DD (n) 11 WCC (x109/L) 11.3 ± 1.4 CRP (mg/L) 100.1 ± 25.7 Lactate (mmol/L) 1.3 ± 0.7 Op time (mins) 119.0 ± 15.3 Bx 6 Polypectomy 5 Colonoscopy 21 (9 incomplete) Flexi siggy 1 Sedation 16 Entonox 5 GA 1 Xray 10 CT scan 22 Conservative 9 Surgery 13 Stoma (n) 6 Lap 2 Lap open 2 Open 9 Conclusion Colonic perforation during colonoscopy is increased in: polypectomy (especially right colonic), therapeutic EMR, diseased bowel (IBD inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease), & in challenging colons. The management of colonoscopy perforation should individualized with early clinical & radiological diagnosis. Site and size of colonic perforation determines management. Good bowel preparations, minimizes contamination and therefore allows safe conservative management of small colonoscopy perforation.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
East Cheshire NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.