WP6.17 - Assessing the value of a general surgical handbook to improve confidence levels in foundation year one doctors

Abstract Aims Evaluate the surgical handbook with former foundation year one (FY1) doctors in general surgery. Identify areas where further support could be given to improve confidence levels. Methods FY1 doctors from August 2022 – July 2023 who rotated through general surgery were invited to evaluate the guide in January 2024. Twenty questions used Likert scales (1 to 5: not at all confident to very confident; not useful to very useful) to assess the management of the general surgical patient having read the guide. Four questions assessed the overall value of the guide and a further four questions focused on how to improve the guide; including, individual sections needing further development. Data was initially inputted using Google Docs and analysed in Microsoft Excel. Results 32% (10/31) completed the survey. 100% (10/10) found the guide helpful and felt it would enhance their general surgical experience. 90% (9/10) felt the guide would have a positive effect on their morale through their rotation. Modal scores ranged from four to five for how confident FY1 doctors are in managing different aspects of general surgery having read the guide. Overall, the guide was seen as very useful. Areas where the guide could be improved include; post bariatric surgery, post-surgery nutrition and pancreatitis. Conclusions Evaluation of the surgical guide was very positive. This guide could be used to help enhance the general surgical rotation of FY1 doctors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.196
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WP6.17 - Assessing the value of a general surgical handbook to improve confidence levels in foundation year one doctors

Jayan George, Sashidhar Yeluri, Daniella Savage, D. Scott Brown
British journal of surgery
Innovations in Medical Education
article

WP6.17 - Assessing the value of a general surgical handbook to improve confidence levels in foundation year one doctors

Jayan George, Sashidhar Yeluri, Daniella Savage, D. Scott Brown
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Evaluate the surgical handbook with former foundation year one (FY1) doctors in general surgery. Identify areas where further support could be given to improve confidence levels. Methods FY1 doctors from August 2022 – July 2023 who rotated through general surgery were invited to evaluate the guide in January 2024. Twenty questions used Likert scales (1 to 5: not at all confident to very confident; not useful to very useful) to assess the management of the general surgical patient having read the guide. Four questions assessed the overall value of the guide and a further four questions focused on how to improve the guide; including, individual sections needing further development. Data was initially inputted using Google Docs and analysed in Microsoft Excel. Results 32% (10/31) completed the survey. 100% (10/10) found the guide helpful and felt it would enhance their general surgical experience. 90% (9/10) felt the guide would have a positive effect on their morale through their rotation. Modal scores ranged from four to five for how confident FY1 doctors are in managing different aspects of general surgery having read the guide. Overall, the guide was seen as very useful. Areas where the guide could be improved include; post bariatric surgery, post-surgery nutrition and pancreatitis. Conclusions Evaluation of the surgical guide was very positive. This guide could be used to help enhance the general surgical rotation of FY1 doctors.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sheffield Children's Hospital (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.