A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol

Abstract Background Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil court orders that prohibit firearm purchase and possession when someone is behaving dangerously and is at risk of harming themselves and/or others. As of June 2024, ERPOs are available in 21 states and the District of Columbia to prevent firearm violence. This paper describes the design and protocol of a six-state study of ERPO use. Methods The six states included are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. During the 3-year project period (2020–2023), ERPO case files were obtained through public records requests or through agreements with agencies with access to these data in each state. A team of over four dozen research assistants from seven institutions coded 6628 ERPO cases, abstracting 80 variables per case under domains related to respondent characteristics, events and behaviors leading to ERPO petitions, petitioner types, and court outcomes. Research assistants received didactic training through an online learning management system that included virtual training modules, quizzes, practice coding exercises, and two virtual synchronous sessions. A protocol for gaining strong interrater reliability was used. Research assistants also learned strategies for reducing the risk of experiencing secondary trauma through the coding process, identifying its occurrence, and obtaining help. Discussion Addressing firearm violence in the U.S. is a priority. Understanding ERPO use in these six states can inform implementation planning and ERPO uptake, including promising opportunities to enhance safety and prevent firearm-related injuries and deaths. By publishing this protocol, we offer detailed insight into the methods underlying the papers published from these data, and the process of managing data abstraction from ERPO case files across the multi-state and multi-institution teams involved. Such information may also inform future analyses of this data, and future replication efforts. Registration This protocol is registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kv4fc/ ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00535-z
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol

Garen J. Wintemute, Reena Kapoor, Jeffrey W. Swanson, Amy Molocznik et al.
8 citations
Injury Epidemiology
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
4.22
article

A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol

Garen J. Wintemute, Reena Kapoor, Jeffrey W. Swanson, Amy Molocznik, Christopher E. Knoepke, Julia P. Schleimer, Michael A. Norko, Ali Rowhani‐Rahbar, Marian E. Betz, Jennifer Paruk, Shannon Frattaroli, Elise Omaki, April M. Zeoli, Veronica A. Pear, Wenjuan Ma, Annette Christy
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil court orders that prohibit firearm purchase and possession when someone is behaving dangerously and is at risk of harming themselves and/or others. As of June 2024, ERPOs are available in 21 states and the District of Columbia to prevent firearm violence. This paper describes the design and protocol of a six-state study of ERPO use. Methods The six states included are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. During the 3-year project period (2020–2023), ERPO case files were obtained through public records requests or through agreements with agencies with access to these data in each state. A team of over four dozen research assistants from seven institutions coded 6628 ERPO cases, abstracting 80 variables per case under domains related to respondent characteristics, events and behaviors leading to ERPO petitions, petitioner types, and court outcomes. Research assistants received didactic training through an online learning management system that included virtual training modules, quizzes, practice coding exercises, and two virtual synchronous sessions. A protocol for gaining strong interrater reliability was used. Research assistants also learned strategies for reducing the risk of experiencing secondary trauma through the coding process, identifying its occurrence, and obtaining help. Discussion Addressing firearm violence in the U.S. is a priority. Understanding ERPO use in these six states can inform implementation planning and ERPO uptake, including promising opportunities to enhance safety and prevent firearm-related injuries and deaths. By publishing this protocol, we offer detailed insight into the methods underlying the papers published from these data, and the process of managing data abstraction from ERPO case files across the multi-state and multi-institution teams involved. Such information may also inform future analyses of this data, and future replication efforts. Registration This protocol is registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kv4fc/ ).

Injury EpidemiologyVol. 11(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Colorado Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Duke University (US), University of Washington (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Michigan (US), Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (US), Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of California, Davis (US), Michigan State University (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Yale University, National Collaborative on Gun Violence Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.