FP3.4 - Identifying missed opportunities in emergency presentations of colorectal cancer to improve patient outcomes

Abstract Introduction and Aim A significant proportion of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer are diagnosed during emergency admissions with presentations such as bowel obstruction, perforation and bleeding. Despite increasing numbers of suspected colorectal cancers referrals from the community being sent straight to test, the proportion of patients presenting as emergencies in the United Kingdom remains at20%. Emergency presentations of colorectal cancer are associated with significantly worse outcomes – both short- and long-term, with research suggestive that emergency presentations remain an independent poor prognostic factor following curative colorectal resection. This study aims to assess if patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer following emergency presentation had missed opportunities of diagnosis on previous presentations in secondary care. Methods A database of patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer following emergency presentation from January2020-October2023 was analysed. Previous attendances to the emergency department and outpatient department were identified and assessed for symptoms of colorectal cancer – including abdominal pain, change in bowel habits, rectal bleeding and iron deficiency anaemia – and if these prompted investigation. Results Of 100 patients – 6were identified that had previous presentations with symptoms suggestive of colorectal malignancy. 2 had been reviewed in colorectal clinic prior to their diagnosis, with appropriate planned investigations but were lost to follow up. A further 4 had been seen in ED with symptoms of colorectal cancer but further investigations were not performed. Conclusion The majority of patients diagnosed with colorectal malignancy following emergency presentation had no earlier opportunities of diagnosis in secondary care. Further work needs to be done ensuring the continuity of care of patients following discharge from both the emergency department and clinic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae197.361
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FP3.4 - Identifying missed opportunities in emergency presentations of colorectal cancer to improve patient outcomes

Vardhini Vijay, Narek Sargsyan, Vidhya Charavanamuttu
British journal of surgery
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

FP3.4 - Identifying missed opportunities in emergency presentations of colorectal cancer to improve patient outcomes

Vardhini Vijay, Narek Sargsyan, Vidhya Charavanamuttu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and Aim A significant proportion of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer are diagnosed during emergency admissions with presentations such as bowel obstruction, perforation and bleeding. Despite increasing numbers of suspected colorectal cancers referrals from the community being sent straight to test, the proportion of patients presenting as emergencies in the United Kingdom remains at20%. Emergency presentations of colorectal cancer are associated with significantly worse outcomes – both short- and long-term, with research suggestive that emergency presentations remain an independent poor prognostic factor following curative colorectal resection. This study aims to assess if patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer following emergency presentation had missed opportunities of diagnosis on previous presentations in secondary care. Methods A database of patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer following emergency presentation from January2020-October2023 was analysed. Previous attendances to the emergency department and outpatient department were identified and assessed for symptoms of colorectal cancer – including abdominal pain, change in bowel habits, rectal bleeding and iron deficiency anaemia – and if these prompted investigation. Results Of 100 patients – 6were identified that had previous presentations with symptoms suggestive of colorectal malignancy. 2 had been reviewed in colorectal clinic prior to their diagnosis, with appropriate planned investigations but were lost to follow up. A further 4 had been seen in ED with symptoms of colorectal cancer but further investigations were not performed. Conclusion The majority of patients diagnosed with colorectal malignancy following emergency presentation had no earlier opportunities of diagnosis in secondary care. Further work needs to be done ensuring the continuity of care of patients following discharge from both the emergency department and clinic.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FP3.4 - Identifying missed opportunities in emergency presentations of colorectal cancer to improve patient outcomes — Vardhini Vijay, Narek Sargsyan, et al. · British journal of surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS