Geometric Characterization of Validity of the Lyapunov Convexity Theorem in the Plane for Two Controls under a Pointwise State Constraint

This paper concerns control BVPs, driven by ODEs x′t=ut, using controls u0· &u1· in L1a,b,R2. We ask these two controls to satisfy a very simple restriction: at points where their first coordinates coincide, also their second coordinates must coincide; which allows one to write (u1−u0)·=v·1,f· for some f·. Given a relaxed non bang-bang solution x¯·∈W1,1a,b,R2, a question relevant to applications was first posed three decades ago by A. Cellina: does there exist a bang-bang solution x^· having lower first-coordinate x^1·≤x¯1·? Being the answer always yes in dimension d=1, hence without f·, as proved by Amar and Cellina, for d=2 the problem is to find out which functions f· “are good”, namely “allow such 1-lower bang-bang solution x^· to exist”. The aim of this paper is to characterize “goodness of f·” geometrically, under “good data”. We do it so well that a simple computational app in a smartphone allows one to easily determine whether an explicitly given f· is good. For example: non-monotonic functions tend to be good; while, on the contrary, strictly monotonic functions are never good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Axioms
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13090611
Primary Topic
Optimization and Variational Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Characterization of Validity of the Lyapunov Convexity Theorem in the Plane for Two Controls under a Pointwise State Constraint

António Ornelas, Clara Carlota, M.E. Lopes
Axioms
Optimization and Variational Analysis
article

Geometric Characterization of Validity of the Lyapunov Convexity Theorem in the Plane for Two Controls under a Pointwise State Constraint

António Ornelas, Clara Carlota, M.E. Lopes
article en

Abstract

This paper concerns control BVPs, driven by ODEs x′t=ut, using controls u0· &u1· in L1a,b,R2. We ask these two controls to satisfy a very simple restriction: at points where their first coordinates coincide, also their second coordinates must coincide; which allows one to write (u1−u0)·=v·1,f· for some f·. Given a relaxed non bang-bang solution x¯·∈W1,1a,b,R2, a question relevant to applications was first posed three decades ago by A. Cellina: does there exist a bang-bang solution x^· having lower first-coordinate x^1·≤x¯1·? Being the answer always yes in dimension d=1, hence without f·, as proved by Amar and Cellina, for d=2 the problem is to find out which functions f· “are good”, namely “allow such 1-lower bang-bang solution x^· to exist”. The aim of this paper is to characterize “goodness of f·” geometrically, under “good data”. We do it so well that a simple computational app in a smartphone allows one to easily determine whether an explicitly given f· is good. For example: non-monotonic functions tend to be good; while, on the contrary, strictly monotonic functions are never good.

AxiomsVol. 13(9)
University of Évora (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Optimization and Variational Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.