Challenges for expanding inventories of climate possibilities through indigenous and local knowledges in rural Zambia

This article explores the integration (or marginality) of indigenous and local knowledge (IKL) in donor-driven community climate adaptation (CDCA) projects and the extent to which this helps expand inventories of adaptation possibilities for host communities and strengthen climate adaptation resilience in Zambia. Through multi-level qualitative research design, this study reveals that, even where climate interventions are intentional about being inclusive of community knowledge, they are likely to promote policy-centric knowledges and interventions that invisibilises ILK. Empirical evidence shows the application of CDCA expresses top-down assumptions of livelihood resilience and embeds uncritical views of what community is, including what might be socially and culturally appropriate forms of adaptation. CDCA implementation strategy is exclusionary and misaligned with ILK, affecting possibilities of knowledge intersection. This article elucidates how climate adaptation that marginalises ILK fails to expand inventories of climate adaptation possibilities for communities supposed to be adapting and proposes how this gap could be bridged. (This article is published in the thematic collection ‘African ecologies: the value and politics of indigenous knowledges’, edited by Adriaan van Klinken, Simon Manda, Damaris Parsitau and Abel Ugba.)