Analysis of transient heat conduction in tubes under convective boundary conditions

Abstract In this work, six analytical solutions are given to estimate the energy exchange by transient conduction in pipes with convection conditions. The developed models were adjusted for an interval from 0.2 to 0.8, dimensionless Fourier ( Fo ) and Biot ( Bi ) numbers, from 0.05 to 50 and 0.005 to 50, respectively. In each case, 616 tests of temperature distributions were computed using the Heisler approximate method (HAM) and the exact models proposed, for different combinations of . For the comparison made between the analytical solutions and the HAM, 3696 tests were used, detecting that the HAM correlates with the analytical method with an average deviation of and for 71.2%, and 90.4% of the different values of combinations evaluated. The best fit was found for Case 5, with a mean deviation of and for 81.1% and 92.3% of the data used, respectively, while the weaker fit was detected for Case 2, with a mean deviation of and for 67.9% and 88.2% of the available tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heat Transfer
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.23175
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of transient heat conduction in tubes under convective boundary conditions

J. Luis Luviano‐Ortiz, Yanán Camaraza-Medina, Abel Hernández-Guerrero
3 citations
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer and Optimization
0.64
article

Analysis of transient heat conduction in tubes under convective boundary conditions

J. Luis Luviano‐Ortiz, Yanán Camaraza-Medina, Abel Hernández-Guerrero
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, six analytical solutions are given to estimate the energy exchange by transient conduction in pipes with convection conditions. The developed models were adjusted for an interval from 0.2 to 0.8, dimensionless Fourier ( Fo ) and Biot ( Bi ) numbers, from 0.05 to 50 and 0.005 to 50, respectively. In each case, 616 tests of temperature distributions were computed using the Heisler approximate method (HAM) and the exact models proposed, for different combinations of . For the comparison made between the analytical solutions and the HAM, 3696 tests were used, detecting that the HAM correlates with the analytical method with an average deviation of and for 71.2%, and 90.4% of the different values of combinations evaluated. The best fit was found for Case 5, with a mean deviation of and for 81.1% and 92.3% of the data used, respectively, while the weaker fit was detected for Case 2, with a mean deviation of and for 67.9% and 88.2% of the available tests.

Heat TransferVol. 54(1)
Universidad de Guanajuato (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.