Comparing human and machine speech recognition in noise with QuickSIN

A test is proposed to characterize the performance of speech recognition systems. The QuickSIN test is used by audiologists to measure the ability of humans to recognize continuous speech in noise. This test yields the signal-to-noise ratio at which individuals can correctly recognize 50% of the keywords in low-context sentences. It is argued that a metric for automatic speech recognizers will ground the performance of automatic speech-in-noise recognizers to human abilities. Here, it is demonstrated that the performance of modern recognizers, built using millions of hours of unsupervised training data, is anywhere from normal to mildly impaired in noise compared to human participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0028612
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing human and machine speech recognition in noise with QuickSIN

Matthew B. Fitzgerald, Malcolm Slaney
7 citations
JASA Express Letters
Speech and Audio Processing
2.45
article

Comparing human and machine speech recognition in noise with QuickSIN

Matthew B. Fitzgerald, Malcolm Slaney
article en
7 citations

Abstract

A test is proposed to characterize the performance of speech recognition systems. The QuickSIN test is used by audiologists to measure the ability of humans to recognize continuous speech in noise. This test yields the signal-to-noise ratio at which individuals can correctly recognize 50% of the keywords in low-context sentences. It is argued that a metric for automatic speech recognizers will ground the performance of automatic speech-in-noise recognizers to human abilities. Here, it is demonstrated that the performance of modern recognizers, built using millions of hours of unsupervised training data, is anywhere from normal to mildly impaired in noise compared to human participants.

JASA Express LettersVol. 4(9)
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Speech and Audio Processing
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing human and machine speech recognition in noise with QuickSIN — Matthew B. Fitzgerald, Malcolm Slaney · JASA Express Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS